Blew up a $10k account, still interested. Am I too old/dumb/naive/in the wrong location?

Quantum-computer trading is in the future and not associated with current quantitative traders, putz. Speed is quantifiable and not magic, unlike your reasoning.
 
Quantum-computer trading is in the future and not associated with current quantitative traders, putz. Speed is quantifiable and not magic, unlike your reasoning.
Haha. My girlfriend has learned and forgotten more about the HFT game just listening to me ramble than you understand right now. Get in touch if you ever want to learn anything remotely factual about HFT. Until then, let me just say that it would be my pleasure to be your counterparty.
 
@Q3D first of all, quant trading is short for quantitative trading, not quantum trading. Quantum computing, mass, velocity...discretionary trading isn't physics class. You're misleading people with scare tactics. You make high frequency traders out to be some warlocks who control markets with some magical mechanisms that you fail to cite. Don't try to scare people off by referencing something you clearly don't understand. We're just modern day specialists as far as you and other discretionary traders should be concerned.

Completely agree.

I know very little about "Quantum methods" use in the stock market beyond the numerous articles I've read online the past 2 years ever since a tech documentary on TV about D-Waves computers. I know several big name firms like Goldman Sachs is investing in the technology to determine its use in the markets beyond the current "theories".

It's also "theorized" that in the beginning only the wealthy firms can afford the technology prior to it becoming available to the retail folks.

My point as stated earlier to Q3D, trading has been here since the 17th century and we've had a lot of incredible technological advances that Wall Street has taken advantage of. Yes, initially all new technology use begins at the top and then is used by the bottom retail folks.

As researchers stated...if Quantum becomes available...just like all prior new technologies...Quantum Financial Algorithms use begins at the top and eventually filters down to the bottom (retail). A recent example is algorithms itself, it begin at the top and is now being used by retail traders that have the knowledge and resources to compete with the big institutions.

Google is now involving it in its chrome browser experiments. Thus, is an example of a company using Quantum computing in other areas outside the market in an effort to make it available to the general public. In fact, Microsoft released its Quantum computing simulator to the general public so that academics, scientists and even do-it-yourself eggheads can simulate quantum computing on their laptops.

http://fortune.com/2015/11/13/microsoft-quantum-computing-simulator/

Simply, everyone will have access to it because it will be available to the consumer (general public) and I'll be shocked retail traders will just sit there and not take advantage of the new technology just as retail traders are now taking advantage of algorithm trading.There's also a growing number of discretionary traders getting better at riding the coat-tail of algos and it doesn't involve scalping.

Note: A particular sub-group of discretionary trading is called scalpers. Most can't compete because they don't have competitive fees except for those that have a seat on the exchange, using an execution platform suitable for scalping and so on.

Too bad someone like Q3D is trying to scare retail traders with this info instead of understanding when it becomes of applicable...most will have access to it at the same time when Wall Street begins applying it in real life...thanks to companies like Google and Microsoft.

As for us discretionary traders, our goal is not to compete with other retail trading or professional firm using algorithms. In contrast, just ride their coat-tails but we must understand one key point about automation or algorithm trading...

Not all of them are profitable because they primarily compete with each other. That's the issue I don't understand because if algorithms are so smart...why would one be buying and the other is selling as if they have different views about the market direction even though that view is for a few ticks/pips ???

Can someone enlighten me about the above
...one algo say the direction will be up and another algo say the direction will be down. Thus, if they are so smart and fast...why aren't all of them able to do trades in the same direction at the same time.

Also, a key element is the pending regulations as more regulators get involved especially involving a key element involving algos..."order cancellation rates" that gives the algo a huge advantage. The regulators have openly stated this is "bad behavior" and borders being "illegal" because it lacks transparency due to old rules being taken advantage by HFT instead of the rules being updated for current market environment.

If those rules get updated along with removing special privileges enjoyed only by HFT algo firms and quantum trading becomes available for the retail public as is the goal of companies like Google and Microsoft...there's going to be a completely different ball game...a fair game.

Traders adapt with every new technology...it has always been that way and will always be that way since the 17th century.
 
Last edited:
What do you trade? Fundamental or technical? Long term or short term? Just trying to narrow it down here because there are thousands of courses. And there are NO limits to what you can learn.....for free!!!!
 
Going by your name big all blacks fan eh? Looks like your focus ended in the wrong place, once you start concentrating on chasing money and profits it's usually a very slippy slope down to blowing your account and you probably ended up chasing price all over the place too... Choose a few instruments and stick with them and get your focus back on your process on the bigger time frames. With a small basket of currencies for example you will have more than enough opportunities on the 4hr tf to keep you busy and grow your account. Forget about how much money you want or should be making and get your process in order first.

hear ye, hear ye....

this is a profitable advice for all.... thx u
 
What do you trade? Fundamental or technical? Long term or short term? Just trying to narrow it down here because there are thousands of courses. And there are NO limits to what you can learn.....for free!!!!

Intraday equities. PA/Technical trader
 
I'll try to make this quick. Live in NZ so CFDs are a thing. Used to sim trade when I was younger which worked out quite well, moved that to a small account ($600) in third year at uni 2012, turned that into $1500 or so over the course of 9 months before summer came and I had to drain my account to pay some bills.

Opened up a new account this time last year with $10k, went OK but around mid-year got really stressed with work and CFA study and decided that I needed to multiply my account hugely or else no one was ever going to take me seriously (in terms of turning this into a full-time gig at a firm) so risk management went out the window. Instead of my usual 1-2% per trade (hard limit on 2) I was putting 6-8 up on each trade, few went astray, balance went down, risk went up, you know the rest. Pulled the pin at $3k.

Most profitable on equity market indices, S&P500 (cash rather than futures, spreads were 0.2 better) in particular. However I did dabble in oil (brent and WTI), gold and currencies, especially during the final month, which as you'd expect weren't profitable overall.Now I've got to the end of the year I am really considering my options, which broadly are:
Start up account again (same sorta $10k is manageable financially) and trade whilst still working full time (and level III in June) with a view to somehow leveraging this into a full-time gig.
Move somewhere for a few months and try and get a foot in somewhere (London, singapore, hong kong?? No idea on this).
Register for Topstep trader and get funded that way.

Ultimately the aim would be to work for a prop firm or on HF desk as I get a lot out of other people's experience and advice in general, and I'm sure the same would apply here.

I'm new to this forum having only found it in the past month so hopefully I haven't made any faux pas in creating this. Appreciate any and all advice. Can probably dig up some stats somewhere from my old accounts but not sure how relevant that is given the size. Apologies for the length.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Long story short, mr b trender;
IBD[investors business daily newspaper] compares trading to medical school.

No way is 10k going to be enough for a med or trading school education; those that did it for less than $10,000 pay more later. You should trade + invest; + compare the results say- over 7 years, 10 years................................

Wisdom is profitable to direct; congrats on the cash S& P profits.

PS ;who got the dividends on S& P cash stocks, some one did??????? SPY yields better than 2%, SDY does 2 .....NOT a prediction.
 
Last edited:
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Long story short, mr b trender;
IBD[investors business daily newspaper] compares trading to medical school.

No way is 10k going to be enough for a med or trading school education; those that did it for less than $10,000 pay more later. You should trade + invest; + compare the results say- over 7 years, 10 years................................

Wisdom is profitable to direct; congrats on the cash S& P profits.

PS ;who got the dividends on S& P cash stocks, some one did??????? SPY yields better than 2%, SDY does 2 .....NOT a prediction.

Uhhh...
 
Back
Top