Blacks Get Longer Sentences From GOP Judges

[bone]

The study is textbook author and peer confirmation bias reported by a media outlet with confirmation bias. As far as I can tell reading the NYT link and the original Harvard Study the study was performed by lawyers at Harvard Law School and peer reviewed by lawyers - not scientists or statisticians.

To put it another way; no epidemiologist or academic in the hard sciences would study a population of 1500, note a three to five percent variance between two species or types in the study population, and call that three to five percent variance statistically significant enough to draw a meaningful conclusion.

But I guess a lawyer or a humanities professor would if they had an ax to grind.

 

[exGOPer]

Not according to the the FBI they don't. Blacks are roughly 13% of the population and commit twice their share, while whites are in line with their percentage of the total population. https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2012/crime-in-the-u.s.-2012/tables/43tabledatadecoverviewpdf

But since you don't understand 4th grade math and are obsessed with pedophiles, I can see how you'd get this backwards.
https://www.elitetrader.com/et/search/7513838/?q=pedophile&o=date&c[user][0]=327981

Your list includes 'family' numbnuts

And do explain how this isn't sexual attraction towards children

And this


Here he is sexualizing a 10 year old
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...ropriate-remarks-about-10-year-old-girl-video

Here he is sexualizing a 14 year old
http://www.latimes.com/nation/polit...ting-underage-girls-1476377294-htmlstory.html


Here he is trying to see 15 year olds naked
http://people.com/politics/donald-trump-walks-I.NFO.NFOn-miss-teen-usa-contestants-changing/

Here is the rape allegation with WITNESS statement of a 13 year old
https://splinternews.com/here-are-all-the-times-donald-trump-has-been-accused-of-1793860459

 

[exGOPer]

The study is textbook author and peer confirmation bias reported by a media outlet with confirmation bias. As far as I can tell reading the NYT link and the original Harvard Study the study was performed by lawyers at Harvard Law School and peer reviewed by lawyers - not scientists or statisticians.

To put it another way; no epidemiologist or academic in the hard sciences would study a population of 1500, note a three to five percent variance between two species or types in the study population, and call that three to five percent variance statistically significant enough to draw a meaningful conclusion.

But I guess a lawyer or a humanities professor would if they had an ax to grind.

This is pretty hilarious considering you run an unaccredited 'teaching' business and call yourself a 'professor' nonetheless. I guess self awareness is not really a right wing attribute.

 

[Poindexter]

Your list includes 'family' numbnuts

And do explain how this isn't sexual attraction towards children

Poor exGOPer, lost another debate and can only reply by desperately "whatabouting" Trump.

Since your first talking point is bullshit, I won't waste my time on the others.

Because you've shown you don't understand elementary school math, get out your calculator: 10 + 10 = 20. But maybe you're reading more into it than is there because you think that way? After all, you do post obsessively about pedophilia.

 

[exGOPer]

Poor exGOPer, lost another debate and can only reply by desperately "whatabouting" Trump.

Since your first talking point is bullshit, I won't waste my time on the others.

Because you've shown you don't understand elementary school math, get out your calculator: 10 + 10 = 20. But maybe you're reading more into it than is there because you think that way? After all, you do post obsessively about pedophilia.

Another hit and run post, declare victory regardless of getting a beatdown and run away.

What was bullshit? Your stats included 'family and children', look up violent crimes against children which FBI tracks seprately.

To calculate 10+10 you have to know if the variable x is actually 10 and is a function of the relevant equation where 20 is the output.

Have you done that? No.

Then stop babbling and wasting my time with your bullshit.

 

[bone]

This is pretty hilarious considering you run an unaccredited 'teaching' business and call yourself a 'professor' nonetheless. I guess self awareness is not really a right wing attribute.

Nothing particularly comical about it. I took Engineering Statistics as part of my BS in Engineering and I took Statistical Modeling at graduate school at the University of Chicago. It's not a particularly well designed study from a hard sciences perspective IMO.

 

[exGOPer]

Nothing particularly comical about it. I took Engineering Statistics as part of my BS in Engineering and I took Statistical Modeling at graduate school at the University of Chicago. It's not a particularly well designed study from a hard sciences perspective IMO.

And how does that make you a PROFESSOR?

 

[Poindexter]

Another hit and run post, declare victory regardless of getting a beatdown and run away.

What was bullshit? Your stats included 'family and children', look up violent crimes against children which FBI tracks seprately.

To calculate 10+10 you have to know if the variable x is actually 10 and is a function of the relevant equation where 20 is the output.

Have you done that? No.

Then stop babbling and wasting my time with your bullshit.

 

[exGOPer]

View attachment 186702