Quote from Landis82:
That's why ET has become a joke over the past few years . . . Baron refuses to "weed" these idiots out for fear of loosing web-activity.
He should have instituted a small monthly subscription fee a long time ago. It would have gone a long way to keeping the quality of content up.
Quote from Landis82:
That's why ET has become a joke over the past few years . . . Baron refuses to "weed" these idiots out for fear of loosing web-activity.
He should have instituted a small monthly subscription fee a long time ago. It would have gone a long way to keeping the quality of content up.
Quote from traderNik:
Agree 100%. I wish I knew for sure that the potential revenue from those who would choose to subscribe would equal the ad revenue generated by a site that receives xx page views, (views which are of course padded by the likes of weiners like jreynolds). I have a feeling that the number don't add up.
I've done my share of padding over in P & R, I suppose, but those posts aren't in the trading section. Weiners like jreynolds should be banished to Chit Chat/P & R after it becomes clear what they're here for.
The thought of someone starting a new site with a subscription fee passed through my mind the other day. What a pleasure it would be to have the best of ET at a site where we wouldn't have to deal with this type of thing. I'd pay up in a second.
Quote from Landis82:
That's why ET has become a joke over the past few years . . . Baron refuses to "weed" these idiots out for fear of loosing web-activity.
He should have instituted a small monthly subscription fee a long time ago. It would have gone a long way to keeping the quality of content up.