The original Black-Scholes model is based on many assumptions;
Assumptions about the market in the BS model are:
1) There are no arbitrage opportunities.
2) It is possible to borrow and lend any amount of cash at the same rate as the interest rate of the risk-free asset.
3) It is possible to buy and sell any amount of stock (including short selling).
4) There are no transaction costs in the market.
What's a real life example of #2 and #3?
When market-makers sell/buy options on a stock and make a market, where do they find they money and shares to hedge?
What is a real-life example of #2 in action?
And as far as #4 goes.. there are obviously transaction costs for the dynamic hedger/market maker (clearing fees, exchange fees). Is the cost of the hedge is embedded in the price of the option? If so, where does their profit come from if the price of the option is the cost of dynamically hedging?
Assumptions about the market in the BS model are:
1) There are no arbitrage opportunities.
2) It is possible to borrow and lend any amount of cash at the same rate as the interest rate of the risk-free asset.
3) It is possible to buy and sell any amount of stock (including short selling).
4) There are no transaction costs in the market.
What's a real life example of #2 and #3?
When market-makers sell/buy options on a stock and make a market, where do they find they money and shares to hedge?
What is a real-life example of #2 in action?
And as far as #4 goes.. there are obviously transaction costs for the dynamic hedger/market maker (clearing fees, exchange fees). Is the cost of the hedge is embedded in the price of the option? If so, where does their profit come from if the price of the option is the cost of dynamically hedging?
Last edited:
