Black Pastors Help Rand Paul Divine That Voter ID Laws Are 'Offending People'

+1

I have yet to hear a valid argument against voter ID laws but I've heard dozens of nonsensical ones from libturds.

Voter ID laws inhibit the massive vote fraud that has become an increasingly vital tool for democrats. Hence, such laws are "racist", which is a liberal code word for "I refuse to debate the real issue."
 
Voter ID laws inhibit the massive vote fraud that has become an increasingly vital tool for democrats. Hence, such laws are "racist", which is a liberal code word for "I refuse to debate the real issue."
+10
But of course it's NOT racist to claim that minorities are too stupid and incompetent to get an ID. :D
 
There is no legitimate argument against requiring a photo ID to vote. If democrats really think voters will be disenfranchised, then they should help get these people a photo ID.

If the republicans really don't want to disenfranchise voters then they should help get these people get a photo ID when they pass voter ID laws. But they won't do that might cost them an election.
 
If the republicans really don't want to disenfranchise voters then they should help get these people get a photo ID when they pass voter ID laws. But they won't do that might cost them an election.


We have helped them. There are bmv's literally everywhere. Paid for by republicans.
 
If the republicans really don't want to disenfranchise voters then they should help get these people get a photo ID when they pass voter ID laws.

1081.gif



But they won't do that might cost them an election.
Nice grammar, Mr MENSA.
 
If the republicans really don't want to disenfranchise voters then they should help get these people get a photo ID when they pass voter ID laws. But they won't do that might cost them an election.

Requiring a voter ID does not disenfranchise people. It is a bogus argument by the democrats.
 
"... If the republicans really don't want to disenfranchise voters then they should help get these people get a photo ID when they pass voter ID laws. But they won't do that might cost them an election..."

More stupid shit from Big AHole...

If you want to vote or intend to, YOU go to the effort to qualify and acquire voter ID. It's not incumbent upon others to make sure you are properly qualified and get proper credentials.

Stupid FUCK!

:mad:
 
"... If the republicans really don't want to disenfranchise voters then they should help get these people get a photo ID when they pass voter ID laws. But they won't do that might cost them an election..."

More stupid shit from Big AHole...

If you want to vote or intend to, YOU go to the effort to qualify and acquire voter ID. It's not incumbent upon others to make sure you are properly qualified and get proper credentials.

Stupid FUCK!

:mad:


Poor fragile scat. Can't emotionally handle reading criticism. Cry like a baby you pathetic man.
 
IMO here's a perfect example of the fraud:

I lived in the metro Detroit area from 1978 to 1996 .. John Conyers has been in Congress since 1965, yes 1965! Almost 50 years. He's a scuzzbag. His wife was convicted of taking bribes while she was a Detroit City Council person. She served time in a Federal prison.

http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way...yers-long-time-congressman-off-primary-ballot

Yeah, no voter fraud .. none at all. Oh wait, it says: Rep. John Conyers of Detroit, who's served in the U.S. House for nearly five decades, has failed to collect enough valid signatures to appear on the Aug. 5 Democratic primary ballot, a local election official says.

More ....... Garrett says her office found only 592 of the necessary 1,000 signatures are valid.

So LESS than 60% were valid signatures?

Of course he's black ... so clearly this is a racist accusation.
 
Back
Top