Black man spits in customers food

Quote from pcp198:

short answer, yes.
Heres a fact: Its common for new stories covering a crime to include physical details of the perpetrator such as the height, race and approximate age of the perpetrator. But Peal didn't just put the guys race (which of course is a fact) in as part of a physical description of the guy, he brought it to everyones attention in the headline to make a point.
More...

sniff sniff boo hoo hoo, facts are an inconvenient thing eh?
 
Quote from pcp198:

short answer, yes.
Heres a fact: Its common for new stories covering a crime to include physical details of the perpetrator such as the height, race and approximate age of the perpetrator. But Peal didn't just put the guys race (which of course is a fact) in as part of a physical description of the guy, he brought it to everyones attention in the headline to make a point.
More...

+1
 
Quote from AK Forty Seven:

Why would you need to mention race ?
More...
Because peil is "not" race baiting? In the same way he's "not" a flaming bigot? Or a steaming pile? He's a spiritual theist, don't you know. He's transcendent and sits at (or on) the right hand of god. When others pray to god, peil hears those prayers and whispers counsel in god's ear. He's that holy.
 
Quote from peilthetraveler:

Just stating detailed facts. How come you instantly attack me for mentioning race. How come you didnt attack me for mentioning gender? Should I have titled it "Human being spits in customers food? Why is it wrong to mention race, but not wrong to mention gender?

Seems like a double standard, if you ask me.
More...
Oh, you're so slippery and clever that no one's the wiser. And I bet you can make yourself invisible just by closing your eyes.
 
Quote from pcp198:

short answer, yes.
Heres a fact: Its common for new stories covering a crime to include physical details of the perpetrator such as the height, race and approximate age of the perpetrator. But Peal didn't just put the guys race (which of course is a fact) in as part of a physical description of the guy, he brought it to everyones attention in the headline to make a point.
More...

Perhaps non-union worker would have suited your tastes better?
 
Quote from pcp198:

Piel, I respect you opinion, we usually agree, but lets be clear on my end there is no double standard. Heres why: I dont have any problem if you point out race, gender, religion etc. as long as your trying to make a valid point based on facts or statistics. But it seems there is nothing here to indicate blacks are more likely to engage in this type of behavior. In this case pointing out the guy is black is, at best out of place, at worst, bigoted.
More...

I humbly agree.
 
Quote from PHOENIX TRADING:

sniff sniff boo hoo hoo, facts are an inconvenient thing eh?
More...

And that is called.....TACIT APPROVAL.

But, eh, you cemented your racist legacy here long ago.
 
Quote from RCG Trader:

And that is called.....TACIT APPROVAL.

But, eh, you cemented your racist legacy here long ago.
More...


It doesn't have my tacit approval it has my approval and no it's not racist unless it's common to consider "black" a racist term, it's merely factual.
Of course since it's an inconvenient fact it's auto-magically racist to you.

racist thread title would have been : "N******* spits in customers food"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top