Black judge goes off on white victims because 3 year old daughter is scared of black people

M

Max E.

So 3 black guys invade these peoples home, hold them at gun point, and the judge gets offended by the fact that the 3 year old daughter logically now has a fear of black people. Judge was so offended by what the 3 year old girl said that he lets the robber off with probation.

Thats liberal logic for you.

Here is what im offended by, race hustling assholes like you making excuses for these animals and letting them back into society where they can cause more harm to good people.

 
Last edited:
Not only is this judge a prejudiced white hating bigot, he's dimwitted. Any normal person would have been angry at the criminals for creating a fear of black men in this little girl, not blaming the victim for an understandable response. Plus, the girl is three years old. This asshat holds her to adult standards but lets these scumbag thugs off?

This however is typical of the racial grievance industry. It's the fault of whites who are wary of black crime, not the blacks who actually are committing the crimes. Apparently, the only PC correct move is to suspend all common sense and sense of self preservation when encountering blacks. Otherwise, you are a racist and not even entitled to the protection of the law.
 
Fuck him. That judge is a piece of shit and should be disbarred. This world is so corrupt. Hope that family exercises their 2nd amendment right. Next time some dirtbags home invade, don't leave the the judge any excuse to wax poetic about affirmative action.
 
I want to thank this judge. He has played an instrumental role in helping us see first hand the difference between a nigger and a black man. Job well done...nigger. And fuck anyone who doesn't like hearing the truth.
 
JamesL said:
His biography page is now suspended. Go figure.

http://olustevens.com/

Took down his facebook page too, but there's a cache for that:

http://webcache.googleusercontent.c...book.com/olustevens+&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
More...


Looks like he deleted his twtr account too, but not before tweeting this

"...I will not be intimidated and I am not deterred. My decisions will not please everyone. It comes with the territory.." -- Judge Olu Stevens on Twitter

https://twitter.com/judgeolustevens
 
Great find on the facebook page JamesL lots of people are pissed, and here is what someone wrote for the context of how absurd this judge's ruling was, the average sentence is 10 years+ for people who do what this guy did.

Dennis Morgan:

We assume that “armed robbery” refers to robbery in the first degree when armed with a deadly weapon, categorized under CGS § 53a-134(a)(2) and 53a-134(b) as a class B felony with the added provision that an offender must be sentenced to at least five years imprisonment, which may not be suspended or reduced by the court. The weapon need not be a firearm. Conviction for a class B felony generally results in a definite sentence of imprisonment for one to 20 years, a fine of up to $15,000, or both.

The law also requires a mandatory sentence if an offender committing any class A, B, or C felony uses, has and threatens to use, displays, or indicates by word or conduct that he has a firearm. If the firearm is an assault weapon, the mandatory sentence is eight years (CGS § 53-202j); if not, it is five years (CGS § 53-202k).

The law does not make distinctions with respect to first-time offenders; rather, it provides increased penalties for persistent offenders. However, there are two alternative incarceration programs. One is for offenders who are to be supervised by the Office of Adult Probation (CGS § 53a-39a). But it excludes any offender who receives a mandatory minimum sentence, as is the case with every conviction for first-degree robbery when armed with a deadly weapon. The other is a special program for male defendants age 16 to 21 (CGS § 53a-39b), one requirement of which is that the defendant has never served a term of imprisonment in an adult correctional institution. But it excludes offenders convicted of certain crimes, including first-degree robbery.

AVERAGE SENTENCES

According to DOC's Susan Savage, the department does not maintain information on first-time offenders. It has data about offenders who had never previously been incarcerated, but its computer system does not have the capability to determine an average sentence for those convicted of first-degree robbery with a deadly weapon. Pei Ti Lee, of DOC's research unit, reported a mean sentence of slightly more than 10 years for all inmates currently incarcerated for first-degree robbery with a deadly weapon as a primary offense.
 
Looks like this judge is most likely the product of affirmative action, as he has the lowest evaluation scores on the louisville circuit court. This is what happens when you put people into positions they dont belong in based on skin color.

Louisville Bar Judicial Evaluations Show Lowest Overall Marks for Olu Stevens, Joseph O’Reilly

Louisville’s lawyers have judged the judges. Most of them, anyway.

The lawyers are most satisfied with James Shake on the Jefferson Circuit Court Stephen M. George on the family court.

They’re least satisfied with Olu Stevens on the circuit court and Joseph O’Reilly on the family court.

That’s some of the data released Thursday in the 2013 Jefferson County Judicial Evaluations from the Louisville Bar Association. This spring, the bar solicited 4,435 member lawyers with Jefferson County mailing addresses for the survey—433 attorneys ended up taking part, though they were only to answered for judges they had significant experience with.

This will be the only judicial evaluation of circuit and family judges that the LBA will release before 2014 elections for those offices.

Of those attorneys surveyed, 96 percent were generally satisfied with Shake’s and George’s performances.

On the other end, 69 percent were satisfied with Stevens’ performance and 57 percent were satisfied with O’Reilly’s performance.

Stevens had a significant decline from 2010, the last time LBA members were surveyed on Jefferson Circuit Court judges.

In 2010, 81 percent of respondents were generally satisfied with Stevens’ performance.

Stevens was appointed to the court in 2009 and was elected to a full term the next year.

In an interview, Stevens noted that he presides over the most jury trials of the Jefferson Circuit Judges—and he’s taken a stance against “infinite continuances” (delaying, essentially) of cases.

And, to him, that’s the root of his rating on the general performance question.

“I have denied them unless there’s a reason—something unforeseeable, something affecting the substantial rights of the defendant or something unforeseeable at it relates to the attorney or a party. Lawyers are not used to that.

“And although that has resulted in a decreased number of causes, and the numbers are there to prove it and my high ranking in court management says that. It has resulted in some discontent among certain segments of the bar.”

He said his approached to continuing cases is because defendants may be in custody awaiting trial or civil litigants who may be paying hourly rates for their cases.

Something else interesting—10.3 percent of those who responded to the survey “strongly” agreed that Stevens “Lets personal relationships affect his … judgment.” The next highest responses to that question for a circuit judge was 4.5 percent for Judith E. McDonald-Burkman. The average for all circuit judges was 4.4 percent.

Stevens was surprised by that finding. He said he’s “friendly” with Louisville’s lawyers, but doesn’t really have “personal relationships.”

“I think I have a nice relationship with almost everybody that appears in front of me, but I’ve never allowed it to influence anything that I’ve done here, nor would I,” Stevens said.

Stevens notes that the number of people who responded to the survey make up a small number of the attorneys in town. He adds that he’ll use the data and review his approach to his job.

O’Reilly echoes that sentiment.

“I’m going to review the result s to the extent that there’s some constructive feedback in there. I will study it and learn from it and move forward.”

O’Reilly adds: “I wouldn’t have given myself those marks, if that’s what you’re wondering.”

Interestingly, Stevens and Shake were the only judges with lower satisfaction ratings this year than in 2010. In 2010, Shake’s mark was 97 percent.

Circuit Judge McKay Chauvin had the largest increase in general satisfaction—with 90 percent responding that they were generally satisfied from 78 percent in 2010.

Also, Martin McDonald, a circuit judge with senior status (basically, semi-retired) had a general satisfaction rating of 33 percent—compared to 53 percent in 2010. But McDonald has been a controversial figure.

Here are the general satisfaction ratings for the Jefferson Circuit Judges:

And here are the general satisfaction ratings for Jefferson Family Court:

http://wfpl.org/louisville-bar-judi...est-overall-marks-olu-stevens-joseph-oreilly/
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top