
Quote from mindtrade:
Interesting article, not sure what to make of it but here is a small sample of the link below:
"Donovan thinks that the odd algorithms are just a way of introducing noise into the works. Other firms have to deal with that noise, but the originating entity can easily filter it out because they know what they did. Perhaps that gives them an advantage of some milliseconds. In the highly competitive and fast HFT world, where even one's physical proximity to a stock exchange matters, market players could be looking for any advantage. "
http://www.theatlantic.com/science/...ts-the-tracks-of-bizarre-robot-traders/60829/
Quote from tradingstation0:
A bizarre pattern has been found by a trading firm in the markets, and seems to serve no purpose.
I am the only to think that High Frequency Trading is very damaging to our economies and effectively transform the markets into a giant poker table where only card counters make money?
What about a new law where a huge tax is imposed if you do not keep your stocks for at least a week?
Quote from vikana:
Here's my take:
I think the intention is the pollute the limit book, and move the VMA of the bid/ask away from a true mean. This will trick other algos into buying/selling based on the manipulation.
Quote from JoePaterno:
Maybe everyone's trades are delayed randomly by 5 - 10 seconds seconds. That would perhaps take away the advantage the HFT have.
I am sure there are some here who would whine and disagree, but these institutions are not helping the overall market. I see little value added by subsecond scalpers, and nothing but disadvantages piled onto smaller and home traders.