Bittergate rally?

Quote from sg20:

He is a lelft wing socialist;
More...

First prize! What I don't get is how come so many people don't see it. I've reached the conclusion that many don't want to see it, therefore, it doesn't exist (not to mention the media's love affair with him). Good thing the dem primary loser's constituents will likely go Mccain. I'm not a big fan of his either, but better to have him over the others. And now, Bob Barr wants to be on the top of the Libertarian ticket. LOL.

What an election cycle! Two socialists fighting for the dem ticket, a liberal friend of Teddy and other dems on the repub ticket, and a drug warrior wanting to be on the Libertarian ticket. Man, do we need a new, viable, electable constitutionalist party..bad!
 
what i don't get is why clinton is still in the race. looking at the "bush experiment", why is it so hard to realize that "only one president per family" should be the rule?

But, I should not be talking negative about a successful futures trader on this forum, so I will shut up.
 
Quote from sg20:

he hung a Cuban revolutionary flag in his campaign headquarter and never tried to explain the reason behind it; that will tell you what kind of person he is.
sg20
More...

Well, you got the facts completely wrong on this one. The flag in question was hung in a volunteers office in Houston, TX. Obama had nothing to do with it and the office was not even part of his official campaign. I don't have an opinion either way but at least come up with some factual arguments if you are going to claim he is a socialist.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/365/
 
Quote from shortie:

"only one president per family"
More...

Better yet, one term per prez, 2 term house , 1 term senate reduced to 4 years. Then we would have true representation. Shouldn't be carreer politicians, IMHO. No retirement for politicians. Use the internet and keep em out of DC. They might actually do as they promise.

On the other hand, if majority of media was honest and unbiased, we wouldn't need term limits, would we?
 
Quote from brocklanders:

Well, you got the facts completely wrong on this one. The flag in question was hung in a volunteers office in Houston, TX. Obama had nothing to do with it and the office was not even part of his official campaign. I don't have an opinion either way but at least come up with some factual arguments if you are going to claim he is a socialist.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/365/
More...

Although it was true that he had nothing to do with the flag, my primary argument against him is simple. He is a socialist. Cut and dry. Listen to him talk about taxes and big gov programs. Go to his senate web sight. View his voting record. Look at his money backers and supporters, including the office in Houston. Other friends like media matters, moveon, etc tend to be pretty far to the left, don't you think? More then enough for me to look past his charm and excellent speaking abilities.
 
Quote from wjk:

Although it was true that he had nothing to do with the flag, my primary argument against him is simple. He is a socialist. Cut and dry. Listen to him talk about taxes and big gov programs. Go to his senate web sight. View his voting record. Look at his money backers and supporters, including the office in Houston. Other friends like media matters, moveon, etc tend to be pretty far to the left, don't you think? More then enough for me to look past his charm and excellent speaking abilities.
More...

Supporters like Paul Tudor Jones and Kenneth Griffin? There are a lot of Wall Streeters that are supporting Obama for one reason or another. I agree with some things about his platform and disagree with others. I agree that his voting record, especially on taxes is too left for me. I refuse to vote for McCain (warmonger) or Clinton (liar and even bigger socialist than Obama). I voted for Ron Paul in the primary, unfortunately more people didn't get what he was talking about to make a difference. Oh well, I reserve the right to move out of the country if things get too bad...that option is starting to look attractive more and more each day.
 
Quote from Red_Ink_inc:

Your own words posted on :
11-06-07 07:01 PM

stock_trad3r


Registered: Jun 2006
Posts: 5526


11-06-07 07:01 PM

I can pretty much guarantee this bull market will last for many many more decades. The upside is unlimited. Such arguments were made in 2000 but times have changed though. Valuations arent excesiv.3 Growth is staggering. Globalization and free trade are the driving fators for what will be the biggest rally in the history of the stock market.

Dow 15000 before the end of 2007.

2008 will be a monster rally. he nasdaq will cross 3800 and the dow will cross 18,000.

Gold will pass 1100 and oil will pass 130.

leading sectors will be technology (mainly internet and handset computer markets), materials, construction, defense, comodities, and shipping

The 5 year chart for the nasdaq will more or less begin to resemble a parabola instead of line as is the case now.

FXi will hit 350 and EWZ will hit 110.

GOOG wil rise another 60% and AAPL, AMZN, BIDU RIMM will rise between 60-100% in 2008.

There will be no serious news stories in 2008. NO major dips. The biggest selloff in 2008 may be 3% or so for th indexes.

The global emerging markets rally will continue in full force in 2008, to an even greater extend than in 2007. Hang seng will double.

Romney will win in 2008, defeating Edwards.

We're in an era of economic and financal perpetualism of unlimited upside and global growth.

While my my predictions may seem foolhardy and outlandish, they aren't.

You can poke fun like a loser or you can say hmmmmmm maybe he is right and make money.


*******************************************

How about you do us all a favor and take a hike Nostradumbass.
More...

You are a real sucker for propaganda. The Gummint and Wall St would love more of you, i believe there is a program in schools to produce as many of you as they can.
 
Quote from brocklanders:

Supporters like Paul Tudor Jones and Kenneth Griffin? There are a lot of Wall Streeters that are supporting Obama for one reason or another. I agree with some things about his platform and disagree with others. I agree that his voting record, especially on taxes is too left for me. I refuse to vote for McCain (warmonger) or Clinton (liar and even bigger socialist than Obama). I voted for Ron Paul in the primary, unfortunately more people didn't get what he was talking about to make a difference. Oh well, I reserve the right to move out of the country if things get too bad...that option is starting to look attractive more and more each day.
More...

I kind of agree with you. I'm actually thinking about writing in Ron Paul if he is not on a ticket (depending on who Mccain picks as his mate). Mccain, even though better then the other two, has me concerned. I don't trust him. He voted against the tax cuts, and now he's for extending them. A few other contradictory issues have to be adressed with him. I simply don't trust flip floppers. I would like to vote for a politician who does not change his stance or beliefs to win votes and impress the media. A rare find these days. Im my post mentioning term limits: I believe if a politician could only serve a single term, he would be less likely to lie. Just my belief.
I'm not sure why some wallstreeters would vote for a high tax guy, but Buffet certainly will. Guess he can afford the high taxes. I believe an article in Fortune had it right on before the Obama fad began. According to the story, big corps liked Hillary, since they wouldn't have to pay for health benifits anymore if healthcare is nationalized. Not in the traditional sense, anyway.
I get killed on taxes, even now, although I don't make much. The reason: I'm self employed, and I'm not counting the market. I'm only just now becoming net profitable in this game. That's when I'll really get soaked, I guess. I believe it will be far worse under the current choice of dems.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top