Bitcoin Will Worth $1 Million By This Date, Predicts Cathie Wood

She needs to put at least 50% of her net worth in the crap that she pushes. It's real easy to be bullish when it's other people's money.

Maybe she did already and that's why she's pushing it so hard. I mean did she give her rationale to explain why thinks BTC would hit $1,000,000 by this date 2030, in 8 years or did she just throw that number out there?
 
Last edited:
There have been a number of speculative bubbles, onions, tulip bulbs, South Seas, Mississippi bubble, Japan economy, Nickel, Dot Com Internet stocks, Crypto then NFT's.
They all have one thing in common, flash in the pan.
Ya gotta look for the next best thing, not look over your shoulder forlonly at what once was.
Those thinking crypto going to a million bucks, mate you've missed the boat, it's all over red rover.
 
Last edited:
I don't know why they let bears like Cathie Wood fud Bitcoin ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

In all seriousness, even if Bitcoin stays at a price of $10K-$15K for the next 50 years, it would have served its purpose and Bitcoiners like me would consider it a major success

There is more to Bitcoin than just fiat-converted price

What is more important is that the number of users keep increasing about 150M worldwide (300M worldwide cryptos users), currently

Looking forward to the next user-growth target of 1 Billion worldwide users in the next 5-10 years

-----

The importance of that will not be understood by nocoiners and that's ok. Let's check back in a 1-3 years on our progress
 
I don't know why they let bears like Cathie Wood fud Bitcoin ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

In all seriousness, even if Bitcoin stays at a price of $10K-$15K for the next 50 years, it would have served its purpose and Bitcoiners like me would consider it a major success

There is more to Bitcoin than just fiat-converted price

What is more important is that the number of users keep increasing about 150M worldwide (300M worldwide cryptos users), currently

Looking forward to the next user-growth target of 1 Billion worldwide users in the next 5-10 years

-----

The importance of that will not be understood by nocoiners and that's ok. Let's check back in a 1-3 years on our progress
The problem is all the forked shit/shitcoins. I am long BNB to 345.
 
The problem is all the forked shit/shitcoins. I am long BNB to 345.

Shitcoins (altcoins) can be very lucrative in increasing the bitcoin stack or the $ returns or divided into both

A famous example is the Ethereum ico

1 btc = 2000 Eth per Initial Coin Offering terms & conditions

2000 Eth in today's price is $2.36M or 142 btc

------

In your example, BNB has decimated the btc conversion rate since its inception so even a Bitcoin-maxi would have benefited if the person converted a portion of the btc stack to BNB... and BNB has performed well during this bear market relative to the overall cryptos market

Probably similar thinking in Forex where if a rich person 25 years ago in Venezuela, Argentina, or Turkey was able to convert a significant portion of their net worth to US $ (or assets)
 
Except your hodl will return worse than the USD you guys are trying to replace.





In all seriousness, even if Bitcoin stays at a price of $10K-$15K for the next 50 years, it would have served its purpose and Bitcoiners like me would consider it a major success
 
Except your hodl will return worse than the USD you guys are trying to replace.

Maybe, or maybe it will outperform the USD

Bitcoin is not trying to replace USD which is just another fiat currency

Bitcoin is trying to become true hard money that is not debt-based

Gold and silver-bugs would understand this, but they hate Bitcoin, so there's that
 
Maybe, or maybe it will outperform the USD

Bitcoin is not trying to replace USD which is just another fiat currency

Bitcoin is trying to become true hard money that is not debt-based

Gold and silver-bugs would understand this, but they hate Bitcoin, so there's that

If bitcoin does not increase in price then literally by definition it has not performed better than the dollar (absent ability to lend it vs lending dollars).
 
If bitcoin does not increase in price then literally by definition it has not performed better than the dollar (absent ability to lend it vs lending dollars).

Yes, I misspoke that it was a pre-defined condition of $10-15K

But I stand by my previous statement that Bitcoin would still be a great success for what it was designed for
 
Back
Top