Since when did a shovel cost 0.1%?You have to pay 0.1% to store gold.
Since when did a shovel cost 0.1%?You have to pay 0.1% to store gold.
It started with 1 coin. Now there's over 1400. Crypto = tons of dilution. These guys are going to print themselves to zero with no real winner.
It's very easy to create another coin. You can't create gold out of nothing. That's the key difference.
Bitcoin has numerous advantages over gold, hence why it commands a significant premium
crypto is a scam run by the same scum that used to pimp you penny stocks. how did that work out for you ?
did you cut and paste your buzzwords ?
efficient
disrupt
Gold is overrated in a digital world and is currently in a long-term bear market.
It's not as simple as just creating another coin, the 'network effect' is where a coin derives most of its value.
Bitcoin has numerous advantages over gold, hence why it commands a significant premium.
Yes, it doesn't have intrinsic value, is a difficult asset to value and is extremely volatile but that doesn't mean it doesn't have utility and numerous reasons that make it a superior investment choice for investors.
As a store of value, bitcoin doesnt need to be technically superior than its alt-coin counterparts, it just needs to have a stronger network effect and be more accessible and transferable than gold.
Gold is in big trouble. If I was a large holder of gold, I'd be worried.
The network effect is not something that will easily erode either. Once a digital store of value has a superior network effect and technical superiority (I.e anonymity, lower transaction cost, faster processing) is secondary, it's pretty much bulletproof.
Gold is overrated in a digital world and is currently in a long-term bear market.
It's not as simple as just creating another coin, the 'network effect' is where a coin derives most of its value.
Bitcoin has numerous advantages over gold, hence why it commands a significant premium.
Yes, it doesn't have intrinsic value, is a difficult asset to value and is extremely volatile but that doesn't mean it doesn't have utility and numerous reasons that make it a superior investment choice for investors.
As a store of value, bitcoin doesnt need to be technically superior than its alt-coin counterparts, it just needs to have a stronger network effect and be more accessible and transferable than gold.
Gold is in big trouble. If I was a large holder of gold, I'd be worried.
The network effect is not something that will easily erode either. Once a digital store of value has a superior network effect and technical superiority (I.e anonymity, lower transaction cost, faster processing) is secondary, it's pretty much bulletproof.