Suppose Nighthawk has a position in Bitcoin, would you then be happy for him/her to post the above article (and other opinions) about Bitcoin?
No. I don't care about opinions. They always cost money
Suppose Nighthawk has a position in Bitcoin, would you then be happy for him/her to post the above article (and other opinions) about Bitcoin?
I presume the limit you mentioned is based on per day.
It seems like we have to make multiple number of transfers to stock up the trading account.
Bitcoin is not a Ponzi.
A Ponzi is a specific mathematical form, dependent on outflows structured to be greater than current assets (plus perpetual return) allow. And thus requiring new assets -- new members be added. That is not Bitcoin.
Actually it is bitcoin or any crypto. For 2 reasons:
1. Because of mining and new coins coming into the market, there is a constant need for new money to come in and buy those new coins.


THE FACT IS: There is no "need for new money to come and buy those coins"... People CHOOSE to buy this or that coin...
So what? There's constant selling AND buying pressure everywhere, for anything... If you are so certain the "selling pressure" is so great, why don't you short it? Then it would not be just an opinion/wish on your part.Hey, finally someone tried to argue...
There is a constant selling pressure on Bitcoin
Again, if you are so certain, why don't you short it?Use Finance 101. If a certain product keeps coming to the market in a predictable fashion AND there is no willing buyers, what happens to the price? Oversupply what happens and price drops. Right now it looks like we are reaching an equilibrium between the need for new money and the incoming interest.
Who said the price must be kept up? Everything in this world has price flutuations, some bigger, some smaller, but there will always be ups and downs, why should bitcoin be any different? The speculative value of bitcoin is irrelevant. My personal opinion is that it is indeed too high and it will probably have a rather abrupt correction, but this is just an opinion, worthless, because I honestly have no crystal ball, so I don't dare do make wild assumptions(guesses) about the future.As price raises assuming the everyday sold coins stays the same, more and more money is needed to keep up the equilibrium. Now you could argue that if prices raises, miners sell less new coins and that might be so, but the math stays the same, a constant incoming flow of money is needed to keep up the price.
You could argue that Bitcoi isn't a ponzi, but you picked the wrong feature...
Actually it is bitcoin or any crypto. For 2 reasons:
1. Because of mining and new coins coming into the market, there is a constant need for new money to come in and buy those new coins. I think it is about 31 million bucks per day right now. What do you think where would the price be if nobody buys the new coins, a la Dogecoin?
2. Even if there is no new coins anymore, a system needs a certain number of users to be viable. It can be a small village or a country, but if a new coin has only 3 users, it won't take off. Bigger the initial release and number of eventual coins, the more people you need to sustain its growth.