Truer words...
Blockchains are, at their core, simply append-only spreadsheets maintained across decentralized “peer-to-peer” networks, not unlike those used for torrenting pirated files.
And are you suggesting this is negative?
Let's just go right to the roots and see if anyone can argue with what I consider to be first principles. Money is simply a way to store and exchange value. The barter system had to evolve because often, two people couldn't trade directly because neither had what the other person wanted. So you need an intermediary "item" to accept that you can later use to exchange for something that you need.
Gold was considered this because it had world wide acceptance, and most importantly, couldn't be created without putting in hard work. Lots of alchemists tried, but in the end, only digging it up out of the ground is how you "create" gold. So when someone accepts gold as a form of payment, they inherently know that lots of work was put into sourcing this gold, and they also know that anyone will be willing to accept this gold in the future.
Money has throughout time been many different things, but central to all the various forms is this idea that you can later exchange it for something else, that it won't degrade, and most importantly, that its not easy to source. Case in point, glass beads were once thought of as valuable until the Europeans started flooding the market with easy supply, something the Africans didn't know was possible.
When government prints money, even when banks create money originating from loans, they are essentially circumventing one of the most important properties of money, the fact that it takes lots of work to create it. If whatever you use as money is easy to create, then the value dramatically drops. If I accept $100 as a daily wage, but the government just prints that $100 and gives it to someone who did no work, but work was instantly devalued.
So if this is all that money is, if its main purpose is simply to keep track of value that we all exchange amongst ourselves, then why can't it be a simple spreadsheet that everyone has a copy of and comes to an agreement about how its 100% accurate?
You seem to want to degrade Bitcoin because its just a spreadsheet, but this is actually why its the best form of money ever created. The blockchain doesn't do anything else, it has no other purpose. It doesn't have multiple properties, and this is a good thing.
I know you're smart enough to understand, but if you would like to contribute an answer to where this breaks down, I'm willing to listen.