Yes... exactly this!Because the 'energy' that is put into (stored) into the coin wasn't useless? It took effort and expense.
This is why we traded glass-beads, sea-shells, etc. for thousands of years. The work put into them was labour intensive. All that time and effort put into them was considered a store of value in itself. And why we used them as a means of money/barter/trade/etc.
Its funny because when you really lay out the idea of money, the properties that money needs to have, and what we have tried before and why it failed, the reasons behind Bitcoin really do make sense. And then when you pile on top of this the drawbacks to fiat money, then Bitcoin makes even more sense.
I honestly cannot come up with a logical argument against Bitcoin. Even if you don't like Bitcoin, the fiat system to an intelligent person has to raise eyebrows. So if you can understand that fiat is broken, and then look to a solution, you will literally list all the properties that Bitcoin already has. Its funny to watch financial podcasts where they discuss how many parts of the economy or financial system are broken, and they can so accurately describe what is needed to fix the system, and not make the connection that Bitcoin already does all of this.
Lets say you don't like the energy use and think it should take very little power to run the network. Ok, so then what you want is for the anyone to have the ability to take the network down. Its like limiting password for any online account to 3 characters and then wondering what everyone is always hacked!
Let's also not forget how much energy goes into the fiat system. Its not just a bunch of paper and printers to produce the bills. Its all the useless Fed officials. They have what is it, 1200 PhD's on their payroll? How much energy do they all consume? Then on course you need an entire task-force to worry about counterfit bills, which I'm sure has an entire arm of the FBI. How about all the security needed when these Brinks trucks drive around picking up and delivering cash? How about all the ATM's necessary? And the biggest of all, how about the entire US military invading god knows how many countries simply to keep everyone on the US dollar standard? Add this all up to get an accurate picture of the energy needed for the US dollar system and then compare this to the energy use for the Bitcoin network.
This exercise can of course be completed for every piece of negative bias against Bitcoin. Those who hate Bitcoin simply do not understand it enough, or they benefit too much from the current system so don't want it to change.

