You mean a major player on the global stage? Wake me up when it happens.Are you willing to bet against a major player making a major bitcoin announcement?
You mean a major player on the global stage? Wake me up when it happens.Are you willing to bet against a major player making a major bitcoin announcement?
Defaulted on their gold obligation. No.Russia defaulted on government bonds. America defaulted on its gold obligations.
Both went broke, but some Americans haven't realized that fact yet, as they're in a slowly boiling pot of water, instead of being instantly thrown into it.
That’s the point I’ve struggled with the most, WHY does bitcoin have value. After almost a decade of thinking there’s no way BTC is sustainable (due to governments control over economies) I decided to go with the flow. Right now I’m betting the flow will continue upwards. BTC going to zero is no longer a rational bet unless the whole world economy explodes in an SHTF kind of way. And even then it’s a wild card whether it will go up or down. I’m not all-in like John (currently BTC is 3% of my portfolio) but if he’s right I’ll be better off than 99% of the people I personally know. If BTC mainliners are dead wrong I won’t be ruined either. It’s a low risk/high reward investment from my perspective.That alone does not confer value. What else you got?
Larry Fink and friends ARE major players on the global stage. I’ve also read that the Rothschilds have started buying….You mean a major player on the global stage? Wake me up when it happens.
Isn't that kind of what Tether is doing ?You mean supply and demand is broken? You mean the entire premise of economics has a major flaw? So what you're telling me is that instead of a market force that is established by interested participants who are acting in their own best interests, you want a bunch of guys scheming about how much money should be printed? Managed economies don't work, and this is especially true for money supply.
You tell me how you would value a stock if you knew that all of a sudden, the CEO could print up 25% of the float tomorrow and distribute these shares at will. Would you touch that stock? The incorruptible supply and known future issuance of bitcoin is an amazing feature.
Yeah $40K has a lot of support, but in order to get there the ES would have to drop probably like 10% or so. That probably means a slowing economy or further escalation in the Israel-Hamas-Iran conflict. That is what triggered the last 6% pullback.It's worth knowing that BTC is more or less shadowing the equity market. They both go up and down at the same time. So from a technical perspective, I don't see just how BTC could go up to $1M by the end of this decade unless S&P500 also rises to $100K. But then again, who knows? Ya just never know.
Anyway, if you're thinking about buying BTC and you don't mind waiting, I say wait until it goes down and retest that trendline, which I believe will be around $37K and $40K. That's about 50% pullback from the ATH and you will have saved $35,000. Now, that's a REAL SAVING!
#50%OFF
View attachment 340091
Are you willing to bet against a major player making a major bitcoin announcement?
This might not be huge, but a sign of things to come. Even a 1% allocation in portfolios around the world means huge buying. You tell me how many bitcoins you would have to buy if you made a 1% allocation!!!
https://watcher.guru/news/jpmorgan-chase-discloses-spot-bitcoin-etf-portfolio
Bitcoin is the only asset that is priced at $60k and seems like it has crashed with no hope
$100k will be here soon™
Yeah the genius' that ran LTCM were betting on a ludicrous investment philosophy called reversion to the mean. It blew up in their face. Lee Meriwether III thought bringing in 2 Nobel Laureates (Fisher Black & Myron Scholes) would somehow make them look good. Unfortunately a Nobel Laureate doesn't mean you know anything about trading.It was not that long ago when I was hearing people so sure of themselves that both America and Russia could not and would never do such a thing as default on their debt... unthinkable.
Even when the asian crisis was spreading, these types were so confident on trading forums poh-pohing all the FUD...
And then... it happened. Now we don't hear about hedge funds like LTCM anymore, after leveraging up on bond spreads to the tits. Of course, the excuse after all the dust settled was "The default was a 10-sigma event! How could it have been predicted?! Impossible!"
And now we're hearing the SAME SHIT right now AGAIN...
Some things never change...
Special props to Taleb, who was invited just prior to the blow-up at Long Term Capital. He gave stark warning about the foolish risk they were taking on that trade.
They didn't listen to him.![]()