Round numbers are bad for credibility. When I made invoices in my company I always avoided round numbers, as round numbers suggest that the calculations were not correct. People are suspicious for round numbers. 99% of all the tops and bottoms are not round numbers.
Bitcoin Price Forecast 2023-2030
- Thread starter Lissan
- Start date
Round numbers are bad for credibility. When I made invoices in my company I always avoided round numbers, as round numbers suggest that the calculations were not correct. People are suspicious for round numbers. 99% of all the tops and bottoms are not round numbers.
Logical, as religions are scams too.
Invoices are one thing. Price predictions well into the future and to the penny are quite another. The former comes across as a bit lazy and arbitrary. The latter comes across as charlatanism to anyone who gives it a second thought.
True Believers can also be dangerous. To themselves and others.
All of these 'Ethereum-killers' have been a joke so far in attempts to take over the defi market. But there is one thing that could threaten it that I can think about...
BTC does support a very primitive, but limited ability to run smart contracts. It's really not worth the effort though.
HOWEVER... if there was a proper smart-contract fork for BTC, that would definitely cause quite a stir. You'd now be able to run a whole DeFi system on the BTC chain... it would have a larger market cap than just Ethereum, and.... you could make the EVM totally compatible if you wanted so all Dapps would run on it.
But... there are too many BTC lazer-eyed maxis out there, that this would be hard to implement without push-back by the zealots. And there is an irony in that... since it may very well be their downfall.
I am not so sure how many decades BTC can last as a blue-chip when it's only got brand-name as an advantage. When people lose interest in that... there is nothing left because of its simplicity. The first-mover advantage won't be worth any goodwill anymore.
BTC does support a very primitive, but limited ability to run smart contracts. It's really not worth the effort though.
HOWEVER... if there was a proper smart-contract fork for BTC, that would definitely cause quite a stir. You'd now be able to run a whole DeFi system on the BTC chain... it would have a larger market cap than just Ethereum, and.... you could make the EVM totally compatible if you wanted so all Dapps would run on it.
But... there are too many BTC lazer-eyed maxis out there, that this would be hard to implement without push-back by the zealots. And there is an irony in that... since it may very well be their downfall.
I am not so sure how many decades BTC can last as a blue-chip when it's only got brand-name as an advantage. When people lose interest in that... there is nothing left because of its simplicity. The first-mover advantage won't be worth any goodwill anymore.
Bitcoiners and many crypto people who read your post know that you are clueless and do not know what you're talking about
However, you're spreading misinformation to others
Read this carefully, you do not need any permission from Lazer-eyed maxis to fork Bitcoin
Bitcoin is open source. You can go to github and fork it and make changes and add as many features as you wish and even turn it into a PoS, go research Feathercoin
Many coins are a fork of the Bitcoin code base, you probably don't know that Litecoin is a fork of Bitcoin and was completed in one night by Charlie Lee... and then there's Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin Satoshi Vision...
Wake up and educate yourself
On the subject of prediction and other forms of precognition:
