Market manipulation with a “currency” backed by nothing???
Say it isn’t so!
Say it isn’t so!
That's an interesting point.Market manipulation with a “currency” backed by nothing???
Say it isn’t so!
That's an interesting point.
What would you say best backs a currency?
The algorithm is very tamper-resistant, and the older the transaction, the more tamper-resistant it becomes. Today, to break one-day-old block of transactions would probably take more computing power than the world has.
First of all, the most powerful quantum computer in existence is I think at 64 qubits. Not thousands.nonsense, quantum computing is already here, we are at thousands of quebits if not close to millions, only matter of time.
Strong economies come and they go.how about a strong economy for starters
First of all, the most powerful quantum computer in existence is I think at 64 qubits. Not thousands.
Second, "quantum computer" is a bit of a misnomer. These extremely expensive experimental systems are custom built for a particular computing problem, usually a pretty esoteric one, and are not in any way "general purpose". AFAIU, the algorithm used for bitcoin, though simple enough, is not something that a quantum computer would be good for - see https://www.forbes.com/sites/rogerh...l-not-break-cryptocurrencies/?sh=3873768167b5
Apart from the fact that bitcoin chain growth encryption is self-adjusting to the total computation speed of its network, and will just adjust the difficulty as the technology improves. Yes, even in the unlikely event of quantum computers entering the fray.
The genius of Satoshi Nakamoto, whoever he/they was/were, was in coming up with a methodology that has stood the test of time and new technology and remains just as tamper resistant as it was when computers were orders of magnitude slower and will remain just as resilient when computers are orders of magnitude faster than today. It was a flash of brilliance that continues to amaze.
why would a hodler keep all the booty under one key?so he can steal your coins.
what if not all yo stash is not under one key?
what about the millions of stashes out there?
people will not keep coins offline?
could you detail this logic further?
how widespread would this threat be?
A hacker doesn't need to break the blockchain, just your key so he can steal your coins. Once that happens the confidence as currency or store of value is zero. People will not keep coins offline since that will prevent it going mainstream. Its the achilles heel of crypto.
Wall street guys are dumb as a rock, they only see the money.