Birthers Hail Judge’s Decision That Could “Depose” Obama

Quote from jem:

but you just told me a few days ago - that obama would produce his pdf birth certificate and win?

When I suggested there would be a hearing - you used to laugh and call me a birther...

When I predicted a hearing on the evidence you told me it would never happen.

I am no longer confident in your predictions.

This was my prediction


http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=3412121&highlight=ballot#post3412121



Quote from AK Forty Seven:

You call it a procedural win,I call it a win.As I said Obama will be on every state ballot in 2012,Obama will never be kicked out of office over this birther nonsense and Obama will never have to provide anything more the his COLB which he released 4 years ago which is The State Of Hawaii's official BC and The State of Hawaii has verified


Its around the 81st win in birther cases which makes it 81-0 but you keep hoping jem


 
Quote from stu:

So they didn't say "they decide"....why did you say they did?

They're urging the Secretary of State to come to a conclusion. In other words for him to decide.

They wrote this and said they were not going to participate...

"We also believe that each political party has the absolute legal right to determine who should appear on their primary and general election ballots according to their own rules without interference from outside parties."
 
Quote from AK Forty Seven:

Well since Obama released his first birth certificate /certificate of live birth before he was elected unlke you and your fellow birther attorneys I knew all birthers cases would fail.I have been right so far and you and your fellow birthers have been wrong.This current case is going nowhere...count on it

here is one failed prediction on this thread alone.
I have no interest in reviewing all you comments for more.
 
Quote from Lucrum:

Interesting, I wonder why they reserved a seat for him then.

It's one of those 'shit and hope' posters sent from Birtherstan HQ.
 
Quote from jem:

They wrote this and said they were not going to participate...

"We also believe that each political party has the absolute legal right to determine who should appear on their primary and general election ballots according to their own rules without interference from outside parties."

yeah.... and that is not what you said they said.

That is what they say they believe. That is not what they say they decide.

Putting words in their mouth won't succeed either.
 
Quote from stu:

yeah.... and that is not what you said they said.

That is what they say they believe. That is not what they say they decide.

Putting words in their mouth won't succeed either.

So
when the state party chairman says the democratic party decides who goes on the ballot and that they are no longer participating in state process of who is eligible for the ballot...

It was wrong of me to say the state democratic party said they pick the people on the ballot.

is that how your troll mind works?
 
Quote from jem:

here is one failed prediction on this thread alone.
I have no interest in reviewing all you comments for more.

How is that prediction wrong ? is Obama off GA's ballot ? As of now the current GA case is a Fail
 
Quote from AK Forty Seven:

How is that predation wrong ? is Obama off GA's ballot ? As of now the current GA case is a Fail

How is this prediction wrong --
your spin is "going nowhere"... count on it.
 
Back
Top