Birther lawyer Taitz slapped with $20,000 sanction

Quote from AAAintheBeltway:

Sorry to bring reality into this, but federal district court judges do not spend their time dealing with important matters. The vast majority of a typical district court judge's time is spent dealing with criminal sentencings, plea bargains, etc.

I don't know the facts or background of all this, but a citizen has a constitutional right to bring a lawsuit. Whether or not it is supported by law is seldom a black or white proposition, particularly when the case is as unprecedented as this one. For a judge to order sanctions and try to get an attorney in a high profile case disbarred by the highly politicized California Bar raises questions about his judicial temperament.
More...

G_d have mercy on your ignorant ass.

Federal courts are extremely diligent and really only hear cases of true import, for the most part, otherwise federal court judges are far more likely to grant summary judgment and dismiss a case early on in the process than their state court counterparts.

The above holds doubly for federal courts of appeals.
 
From a previous post with the court ruling, orly, yarly

--------------
First, Plaintiff’s challenge to her deployment
order is frivolous. She has presented no credible evidence and has made no reliable factual allegations to support her unsubstantiated, conclusory allegations and conjecture that President Obama is ineligible to serve as President of the United States. Instead, she uses her Complaint as a platform for spouting political rhetoric, such as her claims that the President is “an illegal usurper, an unlawful pretender, [and] an unqualified imposter.” (Compl. ¶ 21.) She continues with bare, conclusory allegations that the President is “an alien, possibly even an unnaturalized or even an unadmitted illegal alien . . . without so much as lawful residency in the United States.” (Id. ¶ 26.) Then, implying that the President is either awandering nomad or a prolific identity fraud crook, she alleges that the President “might have used as many as 149 addresses and 39 social security numbers prior to assuming the office of President.” (Id. ¶ 110 (emphasis added).) Acknowledging the existence of a document
that shows the President was born in Hawaii, Plaintiff alleges that
the document “cannot be verified as genuine, and should be presumed fraudulent.” (Id. ¶ 113 (emphasis added).) In further support of her claim, Plaintiff relies upon “the general opinion in the rest of the world” that “Barack Hussein Obama has, in essence, slipped through the guardrails to become President.” (Id. ¶ 128.)

Moreover, as though the “general opinion in the rest of the world” were not enough, Plaintiff alleges in her Complaint that according to an “AOL poll 85% of Americans believe that Obama was not vetted, needs to be vetted and his vital records need to be produced.” (Id. ¶ 154.) Finally, in a remarkable shifting of the traditional legal burden of proof, Plaintiff unashamedly alleges that Defendant has the burden to prove his “natural born” status. (Id. ¶¶ 136-138, 148.) Thus, Plaintiff’s counsel, who champions herself as a defender of liberty and freedom, seeks to use the power of the judiciary to compel a citizen, albeit the President of the United States, to “prove his innocence” to “charges” that are based upon conjecture and
speculation. Any middle school civics student would readily
recognize the irony of abandoning fundamental principles upon which our Country was founded in order to purportedly “protect and preserve” those very principles.

-------

Gotta love the wandering nomad part.
 
Quote from jem:

I suppose you have some sort of proof.

If you don't I take it you are a dope.
More...



You are not a US citizen. Now get busy proving that you are or stfu.
 
Quote from jem:

"... The only intelligent position is to say you no proof has been presented by Obama of anything.
More...

Agree. ALL of this issue could have been put to bed by Obama not stonewalling requests for documents... not only on his eligibility for president, but other information about him.

These issues continue, obviously, because satisfactory disclosure has NOT been made.

Makes one think the judge got orders from "higher up"...
 
Quote from Scataphagos:

Agree. ALL of this issue could have been put to bed by Obama not stonewalling requests for documents... not only on his eligibility for president, but other information about him.

These issues continue, obviously, because satisfactory disclosure has NOT been made.

Makes one think the judge got orders from "higher up"...
More...

Bullshit. This is akin to hostage taking. You start down this road, negotiating as it were, it opens up everyone to endless verifications of this document, and more.

If every credible source is going to be discredited by the belief, driven by your ideology, that someone "higher up" is in fact controlling the outcome, then where does it stop? God? Or does it stop when you get the result you, personally, want?
 
Sure Obama could bend to the will of people like you...

Or not...

Odd, the right wing is big on tough leadership who refuses to negotiate with terrorists, but when it comes to that crazy bitch Orly and her followers, Obama should do what they say, simply because they say so?



Quote from Scataphagos:

Agree. ALL of this issue could have been put to bed by Obama not stonewalling requests for documents... not only on his eligibility for president, but other information about him.

These issues continue, obviously, because satisfactory disclosure has NOT been made.

Makes one think the judge got orders from "higher up"...
More...
 
Quote from ByLoSellHi:

G_d have mercy on your ignorant ass.

Federal courts are extremely diligent and really only hear cases of true import, for the most part, otherwise federal court judges are far more likely to grant summary judgment and dismiss a case early on in the process than their state court counterparts.

The above holds doubly for federal courts of appeals.
More...

I'd be careful about calling others ignorant.

You obviously know next to nothing about the court system. Most federal district judges spend the vast majority of their time dealing with criminal cases, courtesy of the War on Drugs, not "cases of true import."

Why the need to be rude about a subject on which you are clueless?
 
It amazes me that people with a pulse - can believe that Obama has presented evidence on this subject.

The birth announcements were admitted forgeries.

What has Obama presented. He has not proffered shit on this subject.

Obamaloons are proving to be far less intelligent than the people they criticize.

if you do not believe me...

tell me where he was born and how you know that for a fact?
 
Quote from jem:

It amazes me that people with a pulse - can believe that Obama has presented evidence on this subject.

The birth announcements were admitted forgeries.

What has Obama presented. He has not proffered shit on this subject.

Obamaloons are proving to be far less intelligent than the people they criticize.

if you do not believe me...

tell me where he was born and how you know that for a fact?
More...

Until you prove you were born in the US, don't speak to US issues. Now get busy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top