Bill Would Ban Teaching of Scientific Theories

Montana Public Radio: “A bill in the state Legislature seeking to regulate science curriculum in public schools got its first hearing Monday. The legislation’s sponsor says by banning scientific theories, the policy aims to prevent kids from being taught things that aren’t true.”

“More than 20 people testified against Senate Bill 235, concerned that it could keep teachers from including gravitational theory, evolution and cell theory in curriculum.”
 
Montana Public Radio: “A bill in the state Legislature seeking to regulate science curriculum in public schools got its first hearing Monday. The legislation’s sponsor says by banning scientific theories, the policy aims to prevent kids from being taught things that aren’t true.”

“More than 20 people testified against Senate Bill 235, concerned that it could keep teachers from including gravitational theory, evolution and cell theory in curriculum.”

There is a GOP clown in the North Carolina legislature who is about to propose a similar bill. I can only assume that these bills are based on a common template which came from an organization like the American Legislative Exchange Council.
 
I wish these woke dummies would make
up their stupid minds but this might be a
good thing.

It means schools can stop teaching their
warped gender theories, things like there
are hundreds of genders, men can have
babies, and all the rest of their nonsense.

Maybe they will stop teaching about
climate change also.
 
I wish these woke dummies would make
up their stupid minds but this might be a
good thing.

It means schools can stop teaching their
warped gender theories, things like there
are hundreds of genders, men can have
babies, and all the rest of their nonsense.

Maybe they will stop teaching about
climate change also.

The intent is to stop teaching gravitational theory, evolution and cell theory. Do you support not teaching this in public schools?
 
The intent is to stop teaching gravitational theory, evolution and cell theory.



Your post says there was a concern those
subjects would be affected, not that there
was an intent to stop teaching them.

I support not teaching the things that
I addressed before. Obviously relevant
subjects need to be taught.
 
Back
Top