As a Christian, Bill Still might feel obligated to devote a whole video to this theme, on this day, instead of the usual political or financial fare.
The idea is generally that a Christian should not hide one's faith, and/or he really believes the information would be helpful.
So this is a chance for Bill to use his pulpit to communicate with the unchurched, although there's good reason to believe his audience is in the choir.
Although I might agree on the historicity of a teacher "Jesus" and that he allowed himself to be crucified, I strongly object to the Judeo-Christian explanations of the reasons...which are based in Jewish priestcraft.
I don't see it as a sacrifice for sins. It might be possible to see "sacrifice for sins" as a poetic parable open for interpretation, but as an actual fact, no.
Also, note well, none of the scriptures dare to speculate on how much pain - or none at all - that Jesus may have experienced. All it says is he refused any pain killers. From that point onward, all pain is assumed.
However, I have reason to believe he did it in large part to demonstrate an ability to feel no pain, and so, to feel no fear...to demonstrate fearlessness based on the confidence that his knowledge of "Christ" (reality, self, god, good, father, kingdom) keeps him not only safe from harm, but also safe from pain.
This observation can change the whole meaning of the event to one that is not useful to Jewish rooted priestcraft.
The demonstration could also mean: if I can forgive this outrage, you can forgive much less.
It could also be a poetic prelude to a deeper meaning, such as: before you can rise as Christ-self, you must die to your [human] self. This corresponds with the saying: "He who lays down his life for Christ''s sake shall take it up again, but he who holds onto his life will lose it".
Note well in the above phrase, he says people should give up their lives for Christ. Christians literally have it backwards when they insist that Christ give up Christ's life for people.