Where is it?
BILL CLINTON IS A RAPIST
- Thread starter Tom B
- Start date
The Clinton's have brought in fellow heavy breather Al Gore who was accused of sexual assault.
So we have Bill Clinton, a rapist, Al Gore who committed sexual assault, Hillary Clinton who protects rapists, Trump an accused rapist and Bernie Sanders who fantasizes about women getting gang raped as he masturbates. What a sick mess we have here!
So we have Bill Clinton, a rapist, Al Gore who committed sexual assault, Hillary Clinton who protects rapists, Trump an accused rapist and Bernie Sanders who fantasizes about women getting gang raped as he masturbates. What a sick mess we have here!
ya its bad.
October 14, 2016
Michael Issikoff says NBC is sitting on devastating tape of Juanita Broaddrick
By Thomas Lifson
The NBC subsidiary of Comcast is reportedly combing its archives for material damaging to Donald Trump but ignoring requests to air the full interview with Juanita Broaddrick by Lisa Myers 17 years ago.
According to Brent Schur of the Free Beacon:
The reporter that first learned about Bill Clinton’s affair with Monica Lewinsky said on Thursday that NBC is sitting on the full tape of its initial interview with Bill Clinton rape accuser Juanita Broaddrick and should release it before the election.
Michael Isikoff, who was a leading reporter during the Monica Lewinsky scandal, said in a Thursday discussion that NBC should release a 17-year-old tape of an interview that it conducted with Broaddrick. Broaddrick has long claimed that the interview that NBC aired edited out her claim that Hillary Clinton was involved in quashing Broaddrick’s rape claims.
“NBC has the full tape of the original Lisa Myers interview,” Isikoff said during an online discussion on Sidewire.com. “NBC ought to check its archive and run the full interview. (AS long as they’re now culling their archives!)”
The network previously ran the tape but edited out material that was damaging to Hillary. This conspiracy has some history to it.
“Folks have made much of the fact that her claim about the conversation she had with Hillary wasn’t in the interview that run,” Isikoff said. “Broaddrick said it got cut out; Lisa Myers has since agreed Broaddrick said this then—and NBC chose to cut it out.”
NBC has never released an unedited version of its interview with Broaddrick.
Both NBC and the Washington Post “closely vetted” Broaddrick’s claims at the time and chose to run with stories on her claims, Isikoff said.
If we believe that the cover-up is always worse than the crime (which has been media gospel since Watergate, regarded as the high point of American journalism by most journalists themselves), then Hillary’s suspected intimidation of a woman raped by her husband in order to keep her silent surely outweighs any of the accusations of boorishness lobbed at Donald Trump.
This time, there is tape. Tape is what made the difference in focusing public attention on Trump's alleged misbehavior.
Maybe it is time for the torches and pitchforks to start parading in front of 30 Rock.
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog..._devastating_tape_of_juanita_broaddrick_.html
Michael Issikoff says NBC is sitting on devastating tape of Juanita Broaddrick
By Thomas Lifson
The NBC subsidiary of Comcast is reportedly combing its archives for material damaging to Donald Trump but ignoring requests to air the full interview with Juanita Broaddrick by Lisa Myers 17 years ago.
According to Brent Schur of the Free Beacon:
The reporter that first learned about Bill Clinton’s affair with Monica Lewinsky said on Thursday that NBC is sitting on the full tape of its initial interview with Bill Clinton rape accuser Juanita Broaddrick and should release it before the election.
Michael Isikoff, who was a leading reporter during the Monica Lewinsky scandal, said in a Thursday discussion that NBC should release a 17-year-old tape of an interview that it conducted with Broaddrick. Broaddrick has long claimed that the interview that NBC aired edited out her claim that Hillary Clinton was involved in quashing Broaddrick’s rape claims.
“NBC has the full tape of the original Lisa Myers interview,” Isikoff said during an online discussion on Sidewire.com. “NBC ought to check its archive and run the full interview. (AS long as they’re now culling their archives!)”
The network previously ran the tape but edited out material that was damaging to Hillary. This conspiracy has some history to it.
“Folks have made much of the fact that her claim about the conversation she had with Hillary wasn’t in the interview that run,” Isikoff said. “Broaddrick said it got cut out; Lisa Myers has since agreed Broaddrick said this then—and NBC chose to cut it out.”
NBC has never released an unedited version of its interview with Broaddrick.
Both NBC and the Washington Post “closely vetted” Broaddrick’s claims at the time and chose to run with stories on her claims, Isikoff said.
If we believe that the cover-up is always worse than the crime (which has been media gospel since Watergate, regarded as the high point of American journalism by most journalists themselves), then Hillary’s suspected intimidation of a woman raped by her husband in order to keep her silent surely outweighs any of the accusations of boorishness lobbed at Donald Trump.
This time, there is tape. Tape is what made the difference in focusing public attention on Trump's alleged misbehavior.
Maybe it is time for the torches and pitchforks to start parading in front of 30 Rock.
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog..._devastating_tape_of_juanita_broaddrick_.html
Why I can't forgive Hillary Clinton: She failed to grapple with the seriousness of her husband's egregious Oval Office offenses
BY CHARMAINE YOEST
When I was 12 years old, a man exposed himself to me, rubbing up against my leg in a crowd at a tourist attraction. As I turned in confusion and horror, the man melted away in the crowd. I later hesitantly told my parents, but there was nothing they could do. I wasn’t harmed exactly. But I remember.
After the video of Donald Trump’s comments about grabbing women surfaced, Canadian author Kelly Oxford tweeted and asked women to post their stories of sexual assault. Nearly 10 million women responded.
As a woman, I wanted to add my voice. But I did not participate in Oxford’s thread because it was contextualized as joining the sorority supporting Hillary Clinton’s candidacy for the first female President.
But I will not vote for her. I am not with her. Because I feel betrayed by her.
When news broke that President Bill Clinton had indulged in an “inappropriate relationship” with Monica Lewinsky in the Oval Office, I was stunned.
As Lewinsky’s story unfolded, I felt a slight solidarity: I served both as an intern, and later full-time in the Reagan White House. Similarly in the Clinton White House, Lewinsky began as an intern, before taking a full-time position.
However, what happened next for Lewinsky has been whitewashed in our collective national consciousness. And Hillary is the one who wielded the brush. Many young people have only the vaguest idea who Monica is, and then only because Beyonce turned her name into a verb in her song, “Partition.” This “Beyonce-ification” of the Lewinsky scandal obscures Bill Clinton’s terrible abuse of power, and Hillary’s role in rescuing her husband and rationalizing his abusive behavior.
So, let’s recall for a moment what happened:
Then-President, Bill Clinton initiated a workplace sexual relationship with an intern. When caught, he denied having sexual relations with “that woman.” His technocratic rationale for maintaining his innocence was that he used a cigar as a surrogate.
He was 49, and she was 22. Perhaps the saddest part of this whole sordid episode was Lewinsky’s testimony to Kenneth Starr’s investigators that she thought they had a real relationship.
The essential point is this: A man in arguably the most powerful position in the world used a very young woman, in an entry-level position in his employ, as a sexual plaything.
And when found out, the Clintons cruelly destroyed her - together.
Hillary’s supporters argue that Bill’s actions are irrelevant since he himself is not on the ballot. But even at that time, in addition to being First Lady, with her lifetime history as a political activist, Hillary was a sort of de facto feminist-in-chief. There were so many issues of gender, power imbalance and workplace dynamics in play. As a nation, we held our breath waiting to see what Hillary would do.
At first, she retreated from public view and said nothing. And then, Hillary rallied. As the impeachment battle began, Hillary became Bill’s foremost apologist; she led the fight to defend him, personally lobbying congressmen and senators to save the Clinton presidency. She ignored the gender and power issues and pointed her wrath at a “vast right-wing conspiracy.”
Politically, the Democrats closed ranks around her. Culturally, feminists followed her lead, sacrificing Lewinsky as a person as so much collateral damage.
And damaged she was. “It may surprise you to learn,” Monica wrote in a 2014 Vanity Fair article, “that I’m actually a person.” She has had to live her entire adult life in the shadow of shame and notoriety, and found herself virtually unemployable.
To this day both Clintons hide behind the canard that the relationship was “consensual.” Hillary writes about the crisis extensively in her book “Living History.” Nowhere does she acknowledge Bill’s abuse of the power of his office, describing his offense as “private behavior.”
Lewinsky herself insists on her own consent to the affair. But even she observes “I was too young to understand the real-life consequences, and too young to see that I would be sacrificed for political expediency . . . I would give anything to go back and rewind the tape.”
At a pivotal moment, Hillary Clinton had a choice between principle and political expediency. She chose power. She framed the scandal as merely a private marital concern, denying the betrayal of public trust and the violation and manipulation of a young powerless girl. Hillary became the victim; Monica became the vixen.
“Where were the feminists back then?” Lewinsky asked in her Vanity Fair piece. “It’s a question that troubles me to this day.”
That question should trouble us all. In the midst of another national conversation on sex and power, I still remember that Hillary co-piloted the destruction of “that woman.”
http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/charmaine-yoest-forgive-hillary-clinton-article-1.2835208
BY CHARMAINE YOEST
When I was 12 years old, a man exposed himself to me, rubbing up against my leg in a crowd at a tourist attraction. As I turned in confusion and horror, the man melted away in the crowd. I later hesitantly told my parents, but there was nothing they could do. I wasn’t harmed exactly. But I remember.
After the video of Donald Trump’s comments about grabbing women surfaced, Canadian author Kelly Oxford tweeted and asked women to post their stories of sexual assault. Nearly 10 million women responded.
As a woman, I wanted to add my voice. But I did not participate in Oxford’s thread because it was contextualized as joining the sorority supporting Hillary Clinton’s candidacy for the first female President.
But I will not vote for her. I am not with her. Because I feel betrayed by her.
When news broke that President Bill Clinton had indulged in an “inappropriate relationship” with Monica Lewinsky in the Oval Office, I was stunned.
As Lewinsky’s story unfolded, I felt a slight solidarity: I served both as an intern, and later full-time in the Reagan White House. Similarly in the Clinton White House, Lewinsky began as an intern, before taking a full-time position.
However, what happened next for Lewinsky has been whitewashed in our collective national consciousness. And Hillary is the one who wielded the brush. Many young people have only the vaguest idea who Monica is, and then only because Beyonce turned her name into a verb in her song, “Partition.” This “Beyonce-ification” of the Lewinsky scandal obscures Bill Clinton’s terrible abuse of power, and Hillary’s role in rescuing her husband and rationalizing his abusive behavior.
So, let’s recall for a moment what happened:
Then-President, Bill Clinton initiated a workplace sexual relationship with an intern. When caught, he denied having sexual relations with “that woman.” His technocratic rationale for maintaining his innocence was that he used a cigar as a surrogate.
He was 49, and she was 22. Perhaps the saddest part of this whole sordid episode was Lewinsky’s testimony to Kenneth Starr’s investigators that she thought they had a real relationship.
The essential point is this: A man in arguably the most powerful position in the world used a very young woman, in an entry-level position in his employ, as a sexual plaything.
And when found out, the Clintons cruelly destroyed her - together.
Hillary’s supporters argue that Bill’s actions are irrelevant since he himself is not on the ballot. But even at that time, in addition to being First Lady, with her lifetime history as a political activist, Hillary was a sort of de facto feminist-in-chief. There were so many issues of gender, power imbalance and workplace dynamics in play. As a nation, we held our breath waiting to see what Hillary would do.
At first, she retreated from public view and said nothing. And then, Hillary rallied. As the impeachment battle began, Hillary became Bill’s foremost apologist; she led the fight to defend him, personally lobbying congressmen and senators to save the Clinton presidency. She ignored the gender and power issues and pointed her wrath at a “vast right-wing conspiracy.”
Politically, the Democrats closed ranks around her. Culturally, feminists followed her lead, sacrificing Lewinsky as a person as so much collateral damage.
And damaged she was. “It may surprise you to learn,” Monica wrote in a 2014 Vanity Fair article, “that I’m actually a person.” She has had to live her entire adult life in the shadow of shame and notoriety, and found herself virtually unemployable.
To this day both Clintons hide behind the canard that the relationship was “consensual.” Hillary writes about the crisis extensively in her book “Living History.” Nowhere does she acknowledge Bill’s abuse of the power of his office, describing his offense as “private behavior.”
Lewinsky herself insists on her own consent to the affair. But even she observes “I was too young to understand the real-life consequences, and too young to see that I would be sacrificed for political expediency . . . I would give anything to go back and rewind the tape.”
At a pivotal moment, Hillary Clinton had a choice between principle and political expediency. She chose power. She framed the scandal as merely a private marital concern, denying the betrayal of public trust and the violation and manipulation of a young powerless girl. Hillary became the victim; Monica became the vixen.
“Where were the feminists back then?” Lewinsky asked in her Vanity Fair piece. “It’s a question that troubles me to this day.”
That question should trouble us all. In the midst of another national conversation on sex and power, I still remember that Hillary co-piloted the destruction of “that woman.”
http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/charmaine-yoest-forgive-hillary-clinton-article-1.2835208
Paula Jones would have been honored,
Republicans kiss Sheldon's ring from every angle.
Republicans kiss Sheldon's ring from every angle.