Also, a large daily range and/or large volume give a hammer better odds. Some market lore surrounding hammers, like the necessity of a tiny upper shadow, is bunk. Extensive backtesting has shown that hammers with a moderate shadow fare much better.
While today's hammer didn't close above the open, it does look a bit stronger than Monday's based on volume (strong) and range (Ok, but nothing special).
While today's hammer didn't close above the open, it does look a bit stronger than Monday's based on volume (strong) and range (Ok, but nothing special).
Quote from Landis82:
For what it's worth . . .
The reliability of Bullish Hammer Pattern is low. It requires confirmation of the implied trend reversal by a white candlestick, a large gap up or a higher close on the next trading day.
If the hammer is characterized by a close above the open thus causing a white body, the situation looks even better for the bulls.
The Bullish Dragonfly Doji pattern is generally considered more bullish than the Bullish Hammer Pattern and a higher reliability is ascribed to this Doji than the Bullish Hammer Pattern.
Notice that the original poster never even described whether or not the "hammer" the other day was characterized by a close above the open, thus causing a white body.