I'm just trying to understand the question. Perhaps I should've been more direct with my response, and phrased it better, i.e.
Yes, of course some form of relative PPP is better than absolute PPP. Who looks at the absolute PPP? The hamburger index ("Big Mac") is purely and simply absolute PPP, and offers nothing (i.e. tradeable information).
Now, relative PPP, combined with other fundamental information, may yield results, though I doubt many here would be interested in said results. Constructing a meaningful relative PPP measurement, I probably don't have to say, is very complicated.
Absolute PPP is for the press to use in order to sound sophisticated...
What do you think fortunatti?