Harvard lost a ton of money during the market turmoil, to the point of getting margin calls it could not meetQuote from drjekyllus:
Harvard lost $500 million in interest rate swaps so they aint too great at investment.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aHou7iMlBMN8
Also, universitys and colleges raised their tuition on average 6.5% this year while the social security administration deemed that there was no increase in the cost of living so there was no increase in the social security pay off. How come the rest of the economy is not experiencing inflation but Big Education still feels the need to boost their prices by 6.5%?
http://www.forbes.com/2009/02/20/harvard-endowment-failed-business_harvard.html
But very few people would cite one example and ignore the rest of the data available, or just as worse, cite an example and not compare to it's peers during the same time, both which would show similar catastrophes befitting them. It is like giving an example of a bad kid because he was called into the principals office once in eight years, or in this case, once in dozens of years?
As far as inflation, you are not the FED, so looking at core inflation as your measure of rising prices or not is by definition incorrect. Everyone jokes that the FED numbers show no inflation if you:
a) don't drive
b) don't eat
c) don't go to school
d) don't pay rent
e) don't drink
f) don't go to the hospital
g) the list is endless
I don't know how these institutions decide to raise tuitions or not. I remember debating with a friend of mine that Ivy League schools cost way too much, and this was ten years ago. He pointed out that I was missing one point, that the only people that pay full tuition at these universities are the rich, and it is they who in effect subsidize the people that can't afford to go there [This was a Freakonomics moment]. I conceded that this may be true, but it was definitly counter intuitive.