Big-3 "Pay2Play" Prop Firms and the COVID-19 crisis?

@Earn2Trade
I did not know you also have Dorman as your FCM. Can a funded trader choose which FCM he wants to have his account with?

We'll be able to respond to that question shortly.
 
And BTW, if no bad news is announced with regard to potential liquidity problems of these prop firms next week, it means they survived the worst. Congratulations to your risk managers as they are the most important people in every trading firm. Keep up the good work
If they're set up like they say they are, they would have systems to cut trades at daily loss limits so can't see there being any issue
 
If they're set up like they say they are, they would have systems to cut trades at daily loss limits so can't see there being any issue

That assumes that Rithmic infrastructure works as it's supposed to, which was not the case during these wild swings, albeit ONLY WITH DEMO ACCOUNTS. As far as I know, live accounts were not affected but still - it is better not to rely just on Rithmic for these firms but also have some other routes to the market to liquidate all if that is needed.

Man, risk managers are probably the most important positions in this business - I like to call myself a risk manager first and foremost, trader in the second place.

@Earn2Trade
That brings me to a question in addition to the choice of FCM between Ironbeam and Dorman - can I also choose to route my orders through CQG rather than Rithmic?
 
My question for open discussion is how do you think these companies will fare in the wake of this current crisis? After all, it's a question of the financial health of their broker. Right? If their broker goes bust, they are essentially out of business...


I don't recall any of the Big-3 Prop Firms (TST, OneUp, E2T) having been around for 2008 Financial Crisis - I could be wrong and would welcome any information from those members with deeper industry knowledge with respect to how solid their foundations are.


LOL "big 3". Not a single trader I know is aware of these businesses and they most certainly would not be interested in them. Those are not even bottom bucket.
 
LOL "big 3". Not a single trader I know is aware of these businesses and they most certainly would not be interested in them. Those are not even bottom bucket.

They are not a scam. They do exactly what they promise to. They offer a fantastic opportunity to become a professional trader to those lacking capital.
They PROBABLY do not have big traders on their books as most likely successful traders have left them after reaching a certain PnL level to look elsewhere for lower commissions, better payout, bigger size, etc. They just do not cater to people who already have money to trade with. Simple as that.
 
Your candor and pro-activity is very much appreciated!

E2T certainly sounds like a great funder


Hi guys,

Not 100% sure if you're speaking about the candidates or the live traders.

Regarding candidates, we haven't experienced a marked increase or decrease in subscription rates over the crisis to date. We assume this is owing to the fact that retail trading is a stay at home occupation for the most part. The examinations are conducted on a simulator. That's clearly stated on our website, emails, dashboard and in our marketing materials.We don't see any indication that data feed providers are experiencing drops in subscription, so we don't expect any changes on this side.

Regarding live traders, we can't speak for other companies but all of our successful Gauntlet Mini candidates go onto trade with Helios Trading Partners. They trade live accounts with real money. It is not a simulated account. @PoopyDeek @SelfMadeDude. In the last two days 17 people have successfully completed the Guantlet Mini and received live trading accounts with Helios Trading Partners.

In our 60 day Gauntlet account, candidates first trade a simulated account until they make their first profit of $5,000.00 and then they go onto live. The reason for this is that in the Gauntlet candidates can hold overnight positions, which means that the entire margin needs to be put up by the prop trading firm. Therefore the prop firm wants another step in between before putting up so much money to secure the trader. For intraday trading such as in the Gauntlet Mini it is not necessary because the margin requirements aren't so high.

Regarding brokers, we have not heard any issues coming from Helios' brokerages (Ironbeam and Dorman) and don't expect any issues in the near term. If something comes up they'd surely be able to transition to alternative brokerages.

Finally, we understand that COVID-19 has caused uncertainty in all facets of our day to day lives. Thankfully in our industry we should be able to whether it more than most since we all basically work from home to begin with. We hope you all stay safe and wish you the best in your trading.
 
That assumes that Rithmic infrastructure works as it's supposed to, which was not the case during these wild swings, albeit ONLY WITH DEMO ACCOUNTS. As far as I know, live accounts were not affected but still - it is better not to rely just on Rithmic for these firms but also have some other routes to the market to liquidate all if that is needed.

Man, risk managers are probably the most important positions in this business - I like to call myself a risk manager first and foremost, trader in the second place.

@Earn2Trade
That brings me to a question in addition to the choice of FCM between Ironbeam and Dorman - can I also choose to route my orders through CQG rather than Rithmic?

That's not been a problem with Ironbeam, however we'll have to check about Dorman. Regardless, only once the trailing drawdown has been covered you can switch to another data provider. Please keep in mind that you have to cover your own costs for that platform.
 
All the revenue is from selling tests. Backed traders are more of an annoyance than anything else. Probably doing better with thin markets blowing people out.
LOL minimike .. you will be shot down shortly by all the sundry and you will be labelled as "another test failure who writes negative comments about this perfect business model"
for making such wild claims ;) you are accusing these so called prop firms to be making more money form selling test...:D than trader's trading performance OMG:caution:
 
Of course they are PROBABLY making more money from selling tests. What is wrong with that?

If you decide to join them you have to be ABSOLUTELY CONVINCED that you are a better trader than the majority of other customers whose money will be used to fund your account. Everyone knows the stats, the rules of the game and should be adult enough to bear the consequences.
I will say again - I am grateful to those people that they offer such an opportunity. Let it continue.
 
LOL minimike .. you will be shot down shortly by all the sundry and you will be labelled as "another test failure who writes negative comments about this perfect business model"
for making such wild claims ;) you are accusing these so called prop firms to be making more money form selling test...:D than trader's trading performance OMG:caution:

@minmike All of the revenue from Earn2Trade is from examinations, educational packages and the Bootcamp. Earn2Trade does not have any other source of revenue. Helios makes money from its traders and payments from Earn2Trade. As we answered already above, the company is certainly not doing better with "thin markets blowing people out". You might be surprised but the swings go in both directions.

@traderjo You are just here to add another negative post? Maybe @minmike doesn't know the answer to the question, but you certainly do. We've addressed it enough times to you. So let's take another trip on the merry go round.

Helios is not a "so called prop firm", it is a prop firm. Earn2Trade makes money from examinations and pays Helios to take successful candidates from Earn2Trade. Both of the companies make money.

And what if Earn2Trade makes more money from examinations than Helios makes from traders? They are not in a competition with each other for revenue. What if a bakery makes more money from it's customers than the farmer makes for selling the wheat to the bakery? What is the principle you are standing for? If examinations help pay for others to be funded why is that a problem? You are not uncovering any conspiracy. We do not deny our business model. The vast majority of people don't consider this to be an issue. You and some others do, we respect that but after so many times what are you still trying to prove? You asked me last time not to "bully" you, as if responding to your accusations and nasty statements is some kind of provocation, yet at every opportunity you are here to provoke. What was the point of your post? People ask legitimate questions and you provide some solidarity for the one accusation that you know has already been addressed multiple times?

You don't like this business model. You think it is morally bad or questionable for whatever reason. You've questioned the ethics, legality and rationale of our business many times, and very often in an uncouth manner. Everyone knows your opinion about this. You've been spreading it on the forum for years, and almost everywhere there is a thread with our name on it. You've established your point. We are not hiding anything from people who want to take our exam. Please just cut it out already, it's getting to be plain obnoxious.
 
Back
Top