Bidu about to tank down below $80

Quote from Arnie:

I agree on the surface it looks like gambling. I would be curious to know how RM manages the risk. How much do you risk for this kind of return?

you could:

short the stock (main play)
buy calls (upside hedge)
 
All this info is available to anyone on yahoo finance. You need to know your s*** well to trade like this. Beginners like me should STAY OUT!!!

Quote from coolweb:

Obiously, he's not just trading on simple information

he has a lot more info on whats happening, maybe options/ instutional action / price action / etc..

Not easy to know, but definately very detailed to the T , where he can bet 50k short shares on into a rising market.
 
Quote from krazykarl:

you could:

short the stock (main play)
buy calls (upside hedge)

FWIW, assuming one to one ratio you've synthetically bought PUTs at the CALL strike price with more transaction costs than the natural.
 
Quote from Rearden Metal:

<i> Are you leveraged with a ton of puts?</i>

---> No, I'm playing it correctly instead. Short stock and naked short Aug 30 & 35 calls.


<i>Also, are you using fundamentals for your evaluation, technicals, or a combination?</i>

----> http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=1159892&highlight=Wall+street#post1159892

P.S.: You may have a chance here after all. I usually get all cocky like this- right before a fall.
:D
RM,
Congratulations on an enormously successful trade or should I say trades on DAKT. :)
I was thinking about this last night and remembering this post of yours above and also remembering Jack Schwager's interview of Mark Cook in Stock Market Wizards http://elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=1116566&highlight=Mark+Cook#post1116566
in which Mark discusses selling naked calls and one trade where he is absolutely hammered. There are 3 posts at the link so keep reading and the last one is just below someone elses. What I'm wondering about is your thoughts on doing this. What if DAKT had good news and it jumped up? I mean this could happen right? Unless you had insider info how can you be positive of how the earnings would go or that there wouldn't be some other news like in Mark Cook's story? It seems like you took an enormous risk which in this case resulted in a huge payout. But what if it had gone the other way? It's all very interesting and it's been fun reading your comments and everyone elses take on the trades. Glad some of you also made some good money on this too. :)
 
Quote from BCE:

RM,
Congratulations on an enormously successful trade or should I say trades on DAKT. :)
I was thinking about this last night and remembering this post of yours above and also remembering Jack Schwager's interview of Mark Cook in Stock Market Wizards http://elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=1116566&highlight=Mark+Cook#post1116566
in which Mark discusses selling naked calls and one trade where he is absolutely hammered. There are 3 posts at the link so keep reading and the last one is just below someone elses. What I'm wondering about is your thoughts on doing this. What if DAKT had good news and it jumped up? I mean this could happen right? Unless you had insider info how can you be positive of how the earnings would go or that there wouldn't be some other news like in Mark Cook's story? It seems like you took an enormous risk which in this case resulted in a huge payout. But what if it had gone the other way? It's all very interesting and it's been fun reading your comments and everyone elses take on the trades. Glad some of you also made some good money on this too. :)

big whoop, one good day and hes back to where he started, besides... i dont think he's leveragin' his buttz on this kinda trades.
 
the best way to enter earning's directional trade is by selling the slightly ITM opposite leg. especially if one expecting moderate move. In case of DAKT , that would of be SEP 30 call. If RM would of be wrong and stock spike after report , the crash in IV would of erase first 5-8% of the loss ( compare to cent per cent loss when shorting).
Then ,even a 60-40 winning ratio (on the direction) becomes a winning strategy.
 
Quote from IV_Trader:

the best way to enter earning's directional trade is by selling the slightly ITM opposite leg. especially if one expecting moderate move. In case of DAKT , that would of be SEP 30 call. If RM would of be wrong and stock spike after report , the crash in IV would of erase first 5-8% of the loss ( compare to cent per cent loss when shorting).
Then ,even a 60-40 winning ratio (on the direction) becomes a winning strategy.

true, i saw some biotech crap puts not movin' more than a couple of ticks after stock plunged 20% due to report...and of course calls premium gone to hell.
 
Quote from BCE:

RM,
Congratulations on an enormously successful trade or should I say trades on DAKT. :)
I was thinking about this last night and remembering this post of yours above and also remembering Jack Schwager's interview of Mark Cook in Stock Market Wizards http://elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=1116566&highlight=Mark+Cook#post1116566
in which Mark discusses selling naked calls and one trade where he is absolutely hammered. There are 3 posts at the link so keep reading and the last one is just below someone elses. What I'm wondering about is your thoughts on doing this. What if DAKT had good news and it jumped up? I mean this could happen right? Unless you had insider info how can you be positive of how the earnings would go or that there wouldn't be some other news like in Mark Cook's story? It seems like you took an enormous risk which in this case resulted in a huge payout. But what if it had gone the other way? It's all very interesting and it's been fun reading your comments and everyone elses take on the trades. Glad some of you also made some good money on this too. :)

1) Cook over-leveraged himself. I didn't.
2) My DAKT stock position was much bigger than my relatively tiny DAKT options positions.
3) Selling 100 calls naked short is no more risky than selling 10,000 shares short in the underlying stock.
4) I keep under 20% of my net worth in my trading account. People ask me what my risk management is- THAT is my risk management.
5) "big whoop, one good day and hes back to where he started, besides... i dont think he's leveragin' his buttz on this kinda trades."
 
Quote from Rearden Metal:

1) Cook over-leveraged himself. I didn't.
2) My DAKT stock position was much bigger than my relatively tiny DAKT options positions.
3) Selling 100 calls naked short is no more risky than selling 10,000 shares short in the underlying stock.
4) I keep under 20% of my net worth in my trading account. People ask me what my risk management is- THAT is my risk management.
5) "big whoop, one good day and hes back to where he started, besides... i dont think he's leveragin' his buttz on this kinda trades."
Thanks for sharing that RM. I wasn't questioning your abilities or strategy either for that matter, although it may have seemed that way. I was mostly wondering about the risks you were willing to take on. I'm sure your trading account is much larger than mine and you can thus leverage much larger positiions and afford to take much larger losses when it goes against you. Of course this also translates into much larger profits when you are right. Again, great trade and thanks for sharing your risk parameters and options strategy. Good trading today. :) Thanks again.
 
Back
Top