To convict one needs evidence beyond a reasonable doubt, not proof
Proof is not needed to convict
With Biden we are just about at the point of evidence beyond a reasonable doubt
Biden Family Tried To Hide Over $10 Million In Foreign Payments: House GOP
- Thread starter ipatent
- Start date
Proof is not needed to convict
With Biden we are just about at the point of evidence beyond a reasonable doubt
So no evidence whatsoever is now considered “evidence beyond a reasonable doubt”. Strange new standard in GOP world.
You didn't address what he wrote. Evidence is any fact making a proposition more or less true. There has been plenty of evidence referenced in this thread. Whether it rises to beyond a reasonable doubt is something we can debate.
There is plenty of evidence implicating Hunter, there has been zero evidence presented that Joe Biden was part of it, in fact your witnesses and paper trail shows the opposite which is why you guys keep moving the post from 'Biden family' to now 'Biden associates'. Soon Biden's neighbor and Biden's neighbor's dog.
Your latest post is laughable, Joe visited a famous restaurant once and that's evidence apparently.
Also let's not forget the whole Shokin bribery nonsense was debunked by your witness but you insist to keep pretending it's still a thing.
The phone calls, the dinners, Pop taking 50% of my salary and 10% for the big guy are all evidence of that.
So where are the receipts that Hunter or his associates ever sent Joe Biden money. There should be plenty of transaction records if any of these claims by GOPers were true.
Theres not enough evidence for an indictment or even a partisan House Impeachment.This bull shit is weaker than Bengazi,Horowitz,Durham,Uranium 1 etc.
And I want Biden to lose in 2024 so I'm biased against him.
Last edited:
Phone calls, dinners, son paying for the family don't constitute crimes. Issue is whether Joe Biden participated in any thing business related, your witness says NO. No bank records, you have Hunter's 'laptop' and not a single message where Joe and Hunter are discussing business.
As for your 'big guy', I have already proven that no such deal ever happened. 'Emphatic NO' - you keep ignoring that. You want to prosecute people for saying no to influence peddling?
'The profiteering paid off': Trump earned millions from Middle East ties while president
The government watchdog group Citizens for Responsible Ethics in Washington (CREW) published a bombshell report on Thursday that former President Donald Trump raked in millions of dollars from five Middle East nations while he was in the White House.
Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Turkey, and Kuwait were all identified as having deep monied ties to Trumpworld, which CREW uncovered from the indicted ex-commander-in-chief's income disclosures.
"Trump made at least $9.6 million from countries in the Middle East during his presidency, according to years of reporting and a CREW analysis of his tax returns," CREW found. "That means Trump pulled in at least six times his official presidential salary in side income from the Middle East alone during his time in office. The total is likely much higher, but public reporting only sheds light on the most high-profile instances of profiteering, and he is only required to report certain types of income on his tax returns."
"What we do know is that becoming president was Trump's best business decision, and his tax returns show how great the office was for his bottom line. As the 2024 election creeps closer, foreign interests including those in the Middle East are already buying access to Trump and pouring money into his pockets."