the first book would have been different.
TBC was not his first book.
the first book would have been different.
but this was better zazzed up taking out that unnecessary academic thoroughness so people like yourself would connect to it
If you actually read the book as you claim, you would know that it was full of footnoted citations and 111 pages of appendices.
Your focusing on the authors’ application of their theories about IQ to the question of race is just typical of a racist using arguments from (there about four fallacies employed).
You brought the book up first.
In any event, there's a worldwide IQ pattern with East Asians above whites above blacks and it holds true regardless of income.
![]()
Again,source
Charles Murray. In a book.
That's a misleading post. I used TBC only for the quote that Appalachian children were scoring higher than the children of black professionals.
There are plenty of books and research papers with similar material.
it shows that you brought up TBC first.
Not by name, and it may actually have been in Losing Ground.
I've read all the major works.