Even Bugenhagen admitted the number would drop close to zero if AA was eliminated.
Which post was that?
Even Bugenhagen admitted the number would drop close to zero if AA was eliminated.
How's your ear?
Even Bugenhagen admitted the number would drop close to zero if AA was eliminated.
inferiority as described by Murray.
The Flynn effect has had plenty of time to operate in fifty years of affirmative action, and there are next to no gains in test scores.The Flynn effect has a ways to go in the US "black" community
Magically however Irish kids dramatically improved their IQ test scores in their lives without changing their DNA.
IQ is only one dimension of measuring a person. I wouldn't call it inferiority. Call it diversity. The Bell Curve had only one chapter on race.
The Flynn effect has had plenty of time to operate in fifty years of affirmative action, and there are next to no gains in test scores.
The Irish and Jews were misclassified by early crude psychometric testing, that probably had a political component. Not the SATs or GMATS.
are the same as used in the Bell Curve i.e. modern and nobody is arguing the tests were not reasonably accurate with some allowance for Irish kids not taking them as seriously as English. The issue is the genes did not change and the same kids by the end of their education were on a par with their English counterparts. This took over 50 years from independence to really kick in, 2-3 generations of university educated. The Bell Curve is a piss poor excuse for science.
I can tell that you didn't read it. One small chapter on race.
The book is appreciated best by inferior whites who want to feel less inferior.
I don't see why..the chapter says Asians and Jews score higher.
Murray and Lynn just did not do good work according to their peers and that's important.