Biden 2020

Tards, be careful, you are not all that smart.

As I have said repeatedly, you are running a covid-centric campaign which admittedly is working well for you, but you will lose your way if the issues suddenly change.

Now you are well on your way to running an All-Ruthie-All-the-Time campaign. Be careful.

And don't even think about arguing that your ilk are smart enough to walk and chew gum at the same time. You know that is not true.

Once again, you are welcome. I am lookin out for you.
 
elderado said:
Holy shit, this was nearly a year ago. Holy shit.

More...


Watch the LED light on Anderson's forehead flickering from yellow to red when Joe is talking.

He is standing there thinking, "Holy Shiite, he knows I am gay and where the fuck is this headed."

Sleepy Joe. Just bombed Italy instead of Iran because they both begin with an "I." Close enough for government work.
 
upload_2020-9-21_19-36-31.png
 
WeToddDid2 said:
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/09/21/joe-biden-voters-dont-deserve-appoint-supreme-court/

Joe Biden: Voters Don’t Deserve to Know Whom I’d Appoint to Supreme Court
More...
No surprise leftists want to operate in secrecy. He says releasing names now would give critics too much time to examine his choices. Why is he terrified of having his choices go through a thorough vetting process? A very public and media driven vetting process, just like they do for everyone else.
 
WeToddDid2 said:
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/09/21/joe-biden-voters-dont-deserve-appoint-supreme-court/

Joe Biden: Voters Don’t Deserve to Know Whom I’d Appoint to Supreme Court
More...


Jeezuz, what a bunch of constitutional gobbledygook that was. He then adds in "I taught constitutional law for 20 years."

Waiting for the election constitutionally is neither here nor there because Trump is still President of the United States for another two and half months after election day regardless of whether he wins or loses. So tell us again, Joe, why he or the people have to see the results of the election first. There is absolutely nothing in the constitution that says that the power to appoint judges transfers to the president-elect from a sitting president.

You can make an argument that there are political reasons why you may or may not want to do something but Joe points out that he taught constitutiional law for 20 years presumably for the purpose of arguing that there is some constitutional point or barrier there. There is not.

Something is not right with that guy.
 
Last edited:
CaptainObvious said:
No surprise leftists want to operate in secrecy. He says releasing names now would give critics too much time to examine his choices. Why is he terrified of having his choices go through a thorough vetting process? A very public and media driven vetting process, just like they do for everyone else.
More...

It is a modified version of Pelosi's statement about Obamacare whereby: You have to vote for the bill to see what's in it. You have to elect Joe to see what Joe would want to do.

womp...womp.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top