Or the annoying lady...Its not over till the skinny lady sings.
https://elitetrader.com/et/threads/...-naming-my-prediction-for-dem-nominee.334633/
https://elitetrader.com/et/threads/...e-its-hillary-2020.322817/page-4#post-4687594
Biden 2020
- Thread starter wildchild
- Start date
https://elitetrader.com/et/threads/...e-its-hillary-2020.322817/page-4#post-4687594
Last weeks polling
#DemsKilledMeToo
I like how you keep trying to peddle tweets as legitimate sources of information.
Joe Biden is a pedophile:
New Accuser Alleges Sexual Harassment By Joe Biden When She Was 14
https://www.dailywire.com/news/new-accuser-alleges-sexual-harassment-by-joe-biden-when-she-was-14
New Accuser Alleges Sexual Harassment By Joe Biden When She Was 14
https://www.dailywire.com/news/new-accuser-alleges-sexual-harassment-by-joe-biden-when-she-was-14
Nothing to see there with Joe on any issue.
The DNC says they look to Obama to determine whether Joe has assaulted anyone and Obama says everything is ok. An efficient process they have there.
Of course, the DNC thought everything was okay with Bill Clinton too.
The New York Times was the one that called for the DNC to investigate/have hearings on Joe. You might, at first glance, think that this is just the lefties trying to protect Joe by keeping everything in a pro-dem forum. Don't be so sure though. Joe has lots of reasons to be paranoid. The New York Times, The Washington Post, Salon, Huffpo etc. write articles of late and take some actions that look like they are trying to force a DNC review of Joe so that they can bag him and replace him in a desperate last minute move. If they can't make that work and accept the "fact" that they are stuck with Joe they will suddenly revert to defending all things Biden because they have no choice. I dont think they are there yet though.
DNC chair dismisses investigation of Biden over Tara Reade allegations
https://nypost.com/2020/05/03/tom-p...igation-of-biden-over-tara-reade-allegations/
The DNC says they look to Obama to determine whether Joe has assaulted anyone and Obama says everything is ok. An efficient process they have there.
Of course, the DNC thought everything was okay with Bill Clinton too.
The New York Times was the one that called for the DNC to investigate/have hearings on Joe. You might, at first glance, think that this is just the lefties trying to protect Joe by keeping everything in a pro-dem forum. Don't be so sure though. Joe has lots of reasons to be paranoid. The New York Times, The Washington Post, Salon, Huffpo etc. write articles of late and take some actions that look like they are trying to force a DNC review of Joe so that they can bag him and replace him in a desperate last minute move. If they can't make that work and accept the "fact" that they are stuck with Joe they will suddenly revert to defending all things Biden because they have no choice. I dont think they are there yet though.
DNC chair dismisses investigation of Biden over Tara Reade allegations
https://nypost.com/2020/05/03/tom-p...igation-of-biden-over-tara-reade-allegations/
The DNC Chairman Tom Perez veered into some goofy shiite, I am tellin' ya.
He tried to defend Biden's refusal to allow anyone to see his University of Delaware records to Hillary's protecting her emails. Crazy stuff right there. I wonder how far he wants to go with that analogy. After all, when Hillary received an order to preserve emails she deleted 35,000 for obvious reasons. Not the best analogy or road to go down, Chairman Dumphuk. Try again. Mind you, I am not sayin he is wrong. It is exactly like Hillary's situation. Except his explanation is bogus.
Oh, and we are not interested in just Tara Reade's personnel records we want to know if Joe has entered into any non-disclosure agreements with women and also staff discussions or records related to Tara Reade that may have been part of Joe's staff records, not in Reade's personnel file.
This Week host Martha Raddatz pressed Perez on why the University of Delaware can't simply "search for Tara Reade" in the documents pertaining to Biden's Senate record.
"This is like Hillary's emails," Perez said, referencing former Secretary of State Clinton. "Because there was nothing there and the reason is if ... if you want to see my personnel records you don't go to the University of Delaware, you're asking them to look for something that doesn't exist."
He tried to defend Biden's refusal to allow anyone to see his University of Delaware records to Hillary's protecting her emails. Crazy stuff right there. I wonder how far he wants to go with that analogy. After all, when Hillary received an order to preserve emails she deleted 35,000 for obvious reasons. Not the best analogy or road to go down, Chairman Dumphuk. Try again. Mind you, I am not sayin he is wrong. It is exactly like Hillary's situation. Except his explanation is bogus.
Oh, and we are not interested in just Tara Reade's personnel records we want to know if Joe has entered into any non-disclosure agreements with women and also staff discussions or records related to Tara Reade that may have been part of Joe's staff records, not in Reade's personnel file.
This Week host Martha Raddatz pressed Perez on why the University of Delaware can't simply "search for Tara Reade" in the documents pertaining to Biden's Senate record.
"This is like Hillary's emails," Perez said, referencing former Secretary of State Clinton. "Because there was nothing there and the reason is if ... if you want to see my personnel records you don't go to the University of Delaware, you're asking them to look for something that doesn't exist."
