Lets assume the following scenario exists every week. Where you can construct a trade with the following characteristics for SPY. Do you believe in the long run this strategy should be more profitable than simply buying and holding the index.
Profit based on 100 shares of SPY for the following SPY % moves:
+5% +$874
+3% +$486
+2% +309
+1% +$155
0% (unchanged) +$36
-1% -$50
-2% -$295
-3% -$516
-5% -$926
The market has to move down nearly 1% to result in the same loss as the gain experienced with the market just sitting still. The strategy does not go negative until a -.4% move.
For up to a 2% move the R/R is favorable to the long side, with greater than 2% moves the R/R is slightly more favorable to the downside.
In my opinion the R/R trade off is fine considering most weeks the market will move less than +/- 2%. In fact, here are some statistics I just ran (have not debugged the script to ensure accurate stats)
For 2000-today:
From Friday to Friday closing, the market is under a +/- 1% 68% of the time, and under +/- 2% 83% of the time. This means for 83% of the weeks, we have a favorable R/R.
In addition the market closed better than -.4% 62% of the weeks.
One thought is you essentially are receiving a .4% gain for 62% of the weeks. I believe this should help you to outperform the SPY by roughly 12% over the course of the year. However, I think its more complicated than that. Another way to look these stats is that the market is +/- 1% 68% of the weeks. And referring to the R/R above, 1% down is -50 while 1% up is +150.. A 3 to 1 advantage. So, I would anticipate that in many weeks we would outperform the broad market by 3x further extending the annual out performance..
What am I missing here?
What would you do with this setup? Would you trade it? Would you use it instead of buy and hold for longer term investing?
Seems like I have to be overlooking something as surely if a set up exists that allowed for 12%+ out performance of SPY it would be used up by big hedge funds?
Profit based on 100 shares of SPY for the following SPY % moves:
+5% +$874
+3% +$486
+2% +309
+1% +$155
0% (unchanged) +$36
-1% -$50
-2% -$295
-3% -$516
-5% -$926
The market has to move down nearly 1% to result in the same loss as the gain experienced with the market just sitting still. The strategy does not go negative until a -.4% move.
For up to a 2% move the R/R is favorable to the long side, with greater than 2% moves the R/R is slightly more favorable to the downside.
In my opinion the R/R trade off is fine considering most weeks the market will move less than +/- 2%. In fact, here are some statistics I just ran (have not debugged the script to ensure accurate stats)
For 2000-today:
From Friday to Friday closing, the market is under a +/- 1% 68% of the time, and under +/- 2% 83% of the time. This means for 83% of the weeks, we have a favorable R/R.
In addition the market closed better than -.4% 62% of the weeks.
One thought is you essentially are receiving a .4% gain for 62% of the weeks. I believe this should help you to outperform the SPY by roughly 12% over the course of the year. However, I think its more complicated than that. Another way to look these stats is that the market is +/- 1% 68% of the weeks. And referring to the R/R above, 1% down is -50 while 1% up is +150.. A 3 to 1 advantage. So, I would anticipate that in many weeks we would outperform the broad market by 3x further extending the annual out performance..
What am I missing here?
What would you do with this setup? Would you trade it? Would you use it instead of buy and hold for longer term investing?
Seems like I have to be overlooking something as surely if a set up exists that allowed for 12%+ out performance of SPY it would be used up by big hedge funds?