Quote from riskarb:
I'd like to hear how a protein-rich diet lowers HDL/LDL per your bullshit lipid argument. Yeah, 154 cals protein/carb. I never stated that the expenditure would make you thin, simply that there is a benefit. My original post makes note of the fact that total expenditure, not the protein/carb ratio, can account for 10% of BMR under a high-protein diet. I'll take >1000 weekly calories in metabolic-burn over the catabolism that accompanies your diet. It's 15lbs a year. The caloric expenditure is a benefit, but overwhelmed by the benefits to LBM.
I get the majority of my protein from beans/legumes and lean meat. Lentil soup, fat free refried beans, peanuts/almonds, fish and chicken. No saturated fats; all sources are Omega 3s and 6s. I supplement with a complete protein[egg white] twice a day and drink at least a gallon of water. I get 100g of daily protein from the egg white shake; 100g, 0g fat, 6g carbs. My bloodwork is flawless.
I showed your excessively high protein doesn't do anything of a genuine practical value for weight loss. You also way overstate the protein requirements of the avg person, and also of the althlete. What's more it is dangerous gamble over long term. You are so obviously old-school.. My high carb is catabolic only in your mind. ALL those animal products do contain at least some sat fat. Anytime you add sat fat to a diet you worsen lipids unless you are also concurrently losing weight. And even then they still may worsen. If you total chlesterol isn't under 150 you're bloodwork isn't "flawless". All this is BS anyway because the current literature considers high protein thermogenic diets to be risky, equivocal, and without merit overall. 50% cals from protein is eating esentially nutrionally devoid food sources other than B12 and fatty acids. Many of the foods you quoted are OVER 25% FAT yet you claim 50%protein/10% fat?? Impossible BS