Quote from nononsense:
I should have mentioned Delphi when I talked about Pascal. Delphi (and Kylix) can be considered as further developments of Pascal. Bungrider is certainly right to mention these.
Talking about VB, it is important to realize that VB6 and VB.NET are essentially incompatible. For people with a lot of running VB6 software, VB.NET is a real pain in the neck. I'll never get caught another time by B.G.'s kids.
I also remember Bjarne Stroustrup, the "inventor" of C++ saying about some other programming languages: "Expensive toys, unfit for solving real problems" - caveat emptor.
In fact the C / C++ lineage of languages goes back on a very long tradition. A lot has been published about their why's by many people, Ritchie, Kernighan, Stroustrup, etc. The fact alone that Java (C#?) copied most from C but dropped its pointers remains incomprehensible in the light of this. The Bell Laboratories people based their entire Unix system on C/C++, so did Sun with its Solaris (no Java here), so did M$ with its NT. It seems to me that the Ritchie's and the Stroustrup's had a point. Where are the Ritchie's and the Stroustrup's of Java, C# & Co. ?
nononsense