Everyone is different. For me, it's price action. I use my indicators to confirm my reason why the trade is a high probability trade. Market will go where it wants to go.
Using TASR to illustrate my point. The chart is for the period of February 2004. It has 3 splits after that, and the splits added up to be a 12:1 split.
On 2/3/2004, TASR opened at 150, then giving all the gain back, and closed at 127. The next morning, it opened at 120. That's 20% from the high, I cannot tolerant something like this. But for those with ball of steel, the stock shot up to 200, a 67% gains in the next 6 sections. It didn't stop there, by Mid April, it's almost at 400.
Using TASR to illustrate my point. The chart is for the period of February 2004. It has 3 splits after that, and the splits added up to be a 12:1 split.
On 2/3/2004, TASR opened at 150, then giving all the gain back, and closed at 127. The next morning, it opened at 120. That's 20% from the high, I cannot tolerant something like this. But for those with ball of steel, the stock shot up to 200, a 67% gains in the next 6 sections. It didn't stop there, by Mid April, it's almost at 400.
Quote from Worldcrusher:
In the hopes of focusing on the technical analysis of a move's strength, as opposed to aspects of trade management, have you observed any kind of highly reliable technical signals to ascertain move exhaustion?
Sincerely,
Daryl