It is easy to be a big mouth critic when you have no facts. Check them out for a free week and if they don't do as I have said, then I'll be happy to post a retraction on ET.Quote from taodr:
Quote from GD2KNO:
I don't know how much you're looking to invest, but you could place as little as $3,000.00 in a passive S&P account that returns 25% a month.
They say it has done so since inception over 4 years ago. I have only tracked it since 8/2002 and they have done it every month.
Their active traders make MUCH more. If you'd like their address please send me a PM.
This should not be allowed. She is always hustling !
Quote from Phantom Trader:
Others on here have claimed to do 1% a day. Doesn't that come out to about 25% a month?
1% of $3,000 would be $30 a day. You would think that would be possible. 1½ NQ points a day could do it. Perhaps the only thing preventing any individual from achieving this is personal discipline and strategy.
Quote from swoop[TR]:
Lack of realism is one of the first cause of trader's demise.
1% a day on average is not impossible if you talk in arithmetic terms. Some people have done 250% per year (250/250=1%)
Arithmetic doesn't mean anything though.
If you talk in geometric terms, the figure is a lot less flattering if on the last day you lose 20%(0.71% in geo vs 0.91% in arithmetic).
What you say has some validity. They did run amuck when their head trader's mom became terminally ill in November, and the guys filling in for him were not accustomed to trading in a way that would be applicable to the signals program.Quote from Tacsian:
I post this only for those who might not know better...most of ET is smart enough to test out any service or claims before diving in, but for any who might not be...
I subscribed to a free trial... Nov. ... loses... each day was followed with "explanations" as to why they were suddenly, after 4 years, experiencing losses. Each day was the "worst loss we've ever had." There were emails about a death of a friend close to the head trader, ...servers failing, for emails not working, explaining paper trading changes they were making for the system.... Sure it might have had 208 weeks of 40+ pts each week and then suddenly stopped generating profits. Systems fail..but...you examine the facts and decide if you believe that, or believe something else.
If they really have the Holy Grail and it just had some demons and got unholy for 2 months, which coincided exactly with the period right after GD2 started hyping it on ET, ... I just felt I should throw out my 2 cents as someone with experience with them.
Quote from Hawkeye23:
Does anyone else have any suggestions as to how they might invest a substantial amount of money?
First, I agree with Nitro, I would not let anyone else manage my money. One need look no further than Red Fox, Willie Nelson, Ted Nugent, Billy Joel, and a host of others to figure out what type of dividends blind faith pays.
If I were to take a risk on a "Hot Hand" I would limit it to 5% of my total net worth. So if I was worth 10 million 500K seems like a reasonable risk, although one that personally I would not take. Look at the recent hedge fund blow-ups for the reasoning behind this paranoia. Perhaps the Eifukus Fund founded in part by George Soros and his $120m rub a dub dub would make for some light reading.
Since I am not crazy about active funds and active managers (present company excluded) I would divide my capital among the ETFs that are on the market. Or some of the lower cost index funds. Then I would just enjoy my time.
Now if this is money that you earned yourself from trading, as the initial question indicates then active management of that money by yourself would make sense. And probably provide some enjoyment. But from Charles Dow to Charles Ellis and over 200 years of "Modern Markets" I have not seen any convincing evidence that "Institutional Money Managers" do much more than give themselves an annuity with your cash, and that is the "BEST" case scenario.