Quote from volente_00:
Every indicator is a derivative of price.
KISS
Some of the best posts are the first to be posted in a thread!
Price and Volume are perfectly incorruptible. Once a trade is executed . . . it's history . . . period.
That being said any chart that isn't primarily based and grounded in Price/Volume
ONLY, not time is inherently flawed or born with a major disadvantage.
EXAMPLE of using multiple indicators to any chart:
Indicator #1 - Potential 75% accuracy
add
Indicator #2 - Potential 75% accuracy
(now the combined accuracy drops to 56.25%)
add
Indicator #3 - Potential 75% accuracy
(now the combined accuracy drops to 42.1875%)
add
Indicator #4 - Potential 75% accuracy
(now the combined accuracy drops to 31.640625%)
Go ahead . . . keep adding indicators if you want to continue to lose money.
Now we all know that the accuracy of ANY indicator, on average, is far less than 75% but I used that to make an extremely "rose colored" point. Now look at using a better example of just 60%.
Indicator #1 - Potential 60% accuracy
add
Indicator #2 - Potential 60% accuracy
(now the combined accuracy drops to 36%)
add
Indicator #3 - Potential 60% accuracy
(now the combined accuracy drops to 21.6%)
add
Indicator #4 - Potential 60% accuracy
(now the combined accuracy drops to 12.96%)
It is no wonder that 95% of traders fail.
Starting with a chart that isn't based in Price/Volume and then adding multiple indicators . . . you might as well donate your money to the market directly and then go fishing.