If that is the special savings or whatever it's called account, then you're wrong. That is for investors, not for traders. I have confirmed this with Swedish advisors and if you trade on it then you should pay regular income tax. Same goes for Netherlands' 1.2% wealth tax on investments. It is useless for traders who open and close positions frequently. Same goes for Switzerland as well. Furthermore, bear in mind that in many countries you become a tax resident the very day you rent or buy an apartment whether you live there or not. The rules are generally way more complex than a simple 183 days stay.
There's a recent thread here where the poster got confirmation from tax authorities there that capital gains would be treated as such, but never as income in Sweden. Investeringssparekonto seems to have been used by swedish traders on this forum, but has serious limitations, the main one beeing possibly products have to be traded on scandinavian exchanges. looked into this around 5 years back, it allowed a bunch of derivatives as well. No plan watsoever to move to sweden in the near future so ahven't checked back in years.
Below the thread, and the post :
https://www.elitetrader.com/et/thre...ries-to-trade-from.288687/page-5#post-4667491
"I contacted the Swedish tax authorities this year. They confirmed that Sweden – as opposed to any other country I have explored – does not tax trading income as business income but exclusively as capital gains irrespective of frequency of trading, volume, education, prior or current profession etc.
That means 30% tax.
Furthermore, there is the added benefit of using the “investeringssparekonto (ISK)” where you are currently taxed around 0.5% of total capital. However, you can only use the local banks, which is a significant drawback since they do not offer the order types of bigger international brokers and most likely inferior execution. Also, you cannot short stocks or use non-listed derivates e.g. CFDs. In practice, therefore, ISK is only relevant for longer term investments. But depending on the amount of longer term investments, ISK can pull the effective taxation significantly below 30%.
The effective taxation for any meaningful level of income for a trader living in Sweden is thus a good deal lower than the effective taxation for a trader living in New York.
On top of that, health care and education including universities are free. In fact you or your children get paid to study.
The immigration situation is a problem, but sentiment is changing.
Caveat: If your trading income is very irregular – i.e. if you often turn in an annual loss, Sweden is not attractive due to the inability to carry losses forward."
About Nederlands, the situation has seen heated discussions in this thread, with various opinions, but it was far from obvious trading profits would be treated as income. One of the latest input was about a higher rate than 1.2% for the bigger portfolio introduced. The poster Ditch came up with several links in dutch supporting the idea one wouldn't be taxed on income- again from memory, rather distant, this thread has been going on for years.
Last edited:

