Quote from CalTrader:
Not at all how we think in any of my companies ..... This is a great way to get a company full of dead wood. If your companies can thrive on simply repeating the same idea over and over and over then these are exactly the type of people you want to hire.
The ability to navigate office politics is antithetical to creating value in any company or business process. If you ever actually worked in a large organization on mission critical projects you would quickly come to realize that most of the people on most projects could as well not be there and about 10% of the project team are the people that actually get something done and more often than not these people dont play politics well.
I have hired many people that did not come out of a top school or at the very top of their class and I have worked with many top management at fortune 100 companies that did not satisfy these criteria. Smart hardworking creative people are difficult to find and using the criteria mentioned will only get mediocre hires IMHO.
Quote from axeman:
Had a conversation with a PHD in econ/finance a few months ago.
So I brought up EMH, and his eyes lit up since he TEACHES that course! LOL.
Anyway.... started talking trading, and after just a few minutes
of digging, I was completely STUNNED at how little he knew
about the markets.
This guy did NOT know what a specialist is, or the bid/offer process
and how price is determined.
Didnt know what a MM is, or all the games these guys play.
Knew nothing about block prints, or trade throughs, NADA....
I suddenly started seriously considering that the college PHD
guys really were 100% theory, and totally clueless when
it came to the real deal.
At least in computer science, I had *ONE* teacher that really
knew his stuff.... ha ha..
My adivce: Statistics and computer science. The rest you cant
get in school.
peace
axeman
Quote from I Missed Boat:
Not knowing how the MMs work doesn't mean an economist is clueless aobut ht e"real deal." Games MMs play is not really relevant to economics, its not even relevant to the intermediate term price of the stocks, so there is no reason this econ prof should care. That's like ripping on a sports therapist for not knowing the rules to playing stick ball.
Quote from axeman:
Had a conversation with a PHD in econ/finance a few months ago.
So I brought up EMH, and his eyes lit up since he TEACHES that course! LOL.
Anyway.... started talking trading, and after just a few minutes
of digging, I was completely STUNNED at how little he knew
about the markets.
This guy did NOT know what a specialist is, or the bid/offer process
and how price is determined.
Didnt know what a MM is, or all the games these guys play.
Knew nothing about block prints, or trade throughs, NADA....
I suddenly started seriously considering that the college PHD
guys really were 100% theory, and totally clueless when
it came to the real deal.
At least in computer science, I had *ONE* teacher that really
knew his stuff.... ha ha..
My adivce: Statistics and computer science. The rest you cant
get in school.
peace
axeman