Best book on Lifting

It's pretty simple. Use periodization.

Compound:
ATG squats
Deads (thickness)
DB bench; flat, incline, decline. Alternating weekly
Dips (free)
Overheads

Group specific:
Bicep curls
Rows (width)

High rep, single/double set:
Abs

There is no better cardio that lap-swimming. Stairs are also great. Use exrx.net
 
Quote from Gabfly1:

A possibility. But I think I'll try what I have in mind first. I begin with my full weight routine, followed by regular cardio or burst, and then finish with my ab routine. I no longer do a split weight routine as I used to until a few years ago. I only work out twice a week in the gym, but the workout lasts a bit over 2.5 hours. And, yes, I know that's not the best or most efficient way to work out, but I don't want to be in the gym more often than that for personal scheduling reasons. And so, one day it will be cardio and the next it will be burst. I don't think I want to do regular cardio and burst on the same day, because then neither will be full out.

That's great. I don't need to tell you that you're a mile ahead of 98% of the rest of the population...
 
Thanks for all the responses - I very much appreciate all the advice. I will try to incorporate HIIT into my routine somehow, someway, someday. I think that is for nitro 2.0, not 1.0 though, for the "look good without clothes" version. For the guy that is going up against the seventeen year old version of himself at the track.

I finally lost some weight this week, but it was a meager 1.5 lbs. I stopped lifting weights not only because I think I may be at cross purposes (as explained in an earlier post) now that I have some fitness, but because my right shoulder definitely felt like I had overextended something. The rest from lifting has done me good anyway.

Lite workouts this weekend, just so as not to lose momentum...
 
As a beginner to the weight game, *I'd* do full a body routine working all major muscle groups each workout three times per week (mon,wed,fri;or tues,thurs,sat). ONE set only of each exercise. No more than 8 exercises. make each set count. ONE set teaches intensity and form. One set teaches to make each set more difficult till I had the form down before I'd even think about another set of each. Adding more sets early on just teaches "sloppiness". If I felt too fatigued at end of each week I'd drop the workouts to twice per week.

:D
 
Quote from killthesunshine:

As a beginner to the weight game, *I'd* do full a body routine working all major muscle groups each workout three times per week (mon,wed,fri;or tues,thurs,sat). ONE set only of each exercise. No more than 8 exercises. make each set count. ONE set teaches intensity and form. One set teaches to make each set more difficult till I had the form down before I'd even think about another set of each. Adding more sets early on just teaches "sloppiness". If I felt too fatigued at end of each week I'd drop the workouts to twice per week.

:D
This was my routine. I got carried away with too much weight and I think I mildly injured my right shoulder. It is almost recuperated now on ~4 days of weight lifting rest, but I see no reason to rush things.

Psychologically, I have it in my head that I have to weigh something, instead of simply be happy with the way I look. I definitely prefer the way I look when I am lifting, but all this stuff at cross purposes is confusing me a little bit.
 
Quote from nitro:

This was my routine. I got carried away with too much weight and I think I mildly injured my right shoulder. It is almost recuperated now on ~4 days of weight lifting rest, but I see no reason to rush things.

Psychologically, I have it in my head that I have to weigh something, instead of simply be happy with the way I look. I definitely prefer the way I look when I am lifting, but all this stuff at cross purposes is confusing me a little bit.

women do not care what your absolute weight is only that you are lean and muscular, clear complexion and confident all which equates to "he's healthy and capable, he'll make strong healthy babies".

(50 million years of evolution at work) :D
 
Quote from nitro:

Thanks for the replies.

Maverick, I agree with everything you say. As mentioned in a previous post, I don't get how movie stars get in shape so fast?

http://www.menshealth.com/spartacus/

If the explanation is, they live in the gym all day long, have special cooks dedicated to them, a highly trained trainer dedicated to them, etc., then I get it, but an explanation there must be.

I did a two hours straight yesterday on the TM and had by far the hardest workout on the TM. At the end I looked like I had stepped right out of the shower. It is interesting how the body gets accustomed to a particular length work out. As I was nearing the end of hour one, I was pretty tired. I pushed through it. Then about fifteen minutes into hour two, I felt like I could walk/run forever. I weighed myself and I had lost two pounds in two hours, 90 delta it was mostly water weight, so I rehydrate by drinking water like mad. I did no weights yesterday as I try not to do weights two days in a row as per most recommendations I read, giving my muscles a chance to repair themselves. Besides, all I wanted was to hit the showers and eat.

I am pretty sore today. Last month of initial goal coming up. I am pretty certain I can get to 175 if I stopped the weight lifting in this month. I am not sure that the weight should be the end-goal anymore as it was initially, but the overall competing goals of putting on muscle and being as lean as possible given that weight, genetics, health, and time expended.



http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2008-02-05-human-growth-hormone_N.htm



http://www.thebadandugly.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/ripped.jpg
 
Quote from Gabfly1:

I think you missed a spot:

:D


Working legs is part of every boxer's routine. The push ups and pull ups are for enhancing the figure. Also those two do not require extra equipment and can be done almost anywhere. No need to spend a grand on fancy weights, and benches.
 
I don't understand something about these studies. If we can produce our own HGH by sleeping, then why is taking the same dosage that our body would produce by sleeping be any worse, especially older people that don't sleep 8 hours? It reminds me of people that suggest that High Fructose Corn syrup is bad for you. If you look at it under a microscope, HFCS is identical in chemical composition as the sugars they replace.

I don't ever plan on taking any of these things nor have I ever, but there seems to be a bunch of bogus, or at least confusing, stuff out there....
 
Quote from nitro:

If you look at it under a microscope, HFCS is identical in chemical composition as the sugars they replace.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------




"Some people have claimed that high-fructose corn syrup is no different than other sweeteners when it comes to weight gain and obesity, but our results make it clear that this just isn't true, at least under the conditions of our tests," said psychology professor Bart Hoebel, who specializes in the neuroscience of appetite, weight and sugar addiction. "When rats are drinking high-fructose corn syrup at levels well below those in soda pop, they're becoming obese -- every single one, across the board. Even when rats are fed a high-fat diet, you don't see this; they don't all gain extra weight."



"Second, as a result of the manufacturing process for high-fructose corn syrup, the fructose molecules in the sweetener are free and unbound, ready for absorption and utilization. In contrast, every fructose molecule in sucrose that comes from cane sugar or beet sugar is bound to a corresponding glucose molecule and must go through an extra metabolic step before it can be utilized.

This creates a fascinating puzzle. The rats in the Princeton study became obese by drinking high-fructose corn syrup, but not by drinking sucrose. The critical differences in appetite, metabolism and gene expression that underlie this phenomenon are yet to be discovered, but may relate to the fact that excess fructose is being metabolized to produce fat, while glucose is largely being processed for energy or stored as a carbohydrate, called glycogen, in the liver and muscles."

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/03/100322121115.htm
 
Back
Top