That is so true. I played in a band where I was the only white member. I saw everyone of those families destroyed because the women were smart and figured out the government made a better husband than some wandering musician. When I started raising my own family I started seeing so many laws and rules that were hard on me but favored the single mothers they created.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Bernie Sanders sounds just like Hitler
- Thread starter wildchild
- Start date
no, but it has to do with how we define benefitsYou misunderstood the main thrust of my post. It has nothing whatsoever to do with what ism provides the greatest number of benefits.
When you start ranking a countries capitalism based on how many government benefits they deny
Or a countries socialism based on how many government benefits they provide
You are already so brainwashed that you only understand benefits if they are provided by the government.
How come I never hear, "America is the only industrialized nation whose citizens don't need the government to provide them with basic needs, like healthcare."?
Or a countries socialism based on how many government benefits they provide
You are already so brainwashed that you only understand benefits if they are provided by the government.
How come I never hear, "America is the only industrialized nation whose citizens don't need the government to provide them with basic needs, like healthcare."?
Last edited:
That is so true. I played in a band where I was the only white member. I saw everyone of those families destroyed because the women were smart and figured out the government made a better husband than some wandering musician. When I started raising my own family I started seeing so many laws and rules that were hard on me but favored the single mothers they created.
I am just wondering when the kids and single mothers were not provided with certain benefits, since divorce rate has been already fairly high, the country's birth rate then would decrease very very much since the females would have great burden for raising up kids if without any extra assistance! Hence negative population growth.
That could be ultimately a great damage to the country's core economy system, if not collapsed in 2 or 3 if not 4 or 5 generations!
Just 2 cents!
Q
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birth_rate
Current
The United States population growth is at an historical low level as the United States current birth rates are the lowest ever recorded.[28] The low birth rates in the contemporary United States can possibly be ascribed to the recession, which led women to postpone having children and fewer immigrants coming to the US. The current US birth rates are not high enough to maintain the size of the U.S. population, according to The Economist.[29][30]
UQ
the womwn went into the baby br
Our education and prison system was not designed to accomodate children of single mothers.
eediI am just wondering when the kids and single mothers were not provided with certain benefits, since divorce rate has been already fairly high, the country's birth rate then would decrease very very much since the females would have great burden for raising up kids if without any extra assistance! Hence negative population growth.
That could be ultimately a great damage to the country's core economy system, if not collapsed in 2 or 3 if not 4 or 5 generations!
Just 2 cents!
Q
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birth_rate
Current
The United States population growth is at an historical low level as the United States current birth rates are the lowest ever recorded.[28] The low birth rates in the contemporary United States can possibly be ascribed to the recession, which led women to postpone having children and fewer immigrants coming to the US. The current US birth rates are not high enough to maintain the size of the U.S. population, according to The Economist.[29][30]
UQ
the women went into the bably breeding business, always at least 4 mostly more. That was more profitable than being married. The men couldn't even sleep at home (on the rare times we passed back through home) for fear of being discovered by the walfare police who would disqualify you if you had a husband or father living at home. And we ended up with not more productive workers contributing to the system, but instead too many uneducated, unemployed or imprisoned.I am just wondering when the kids and single mothers were not provided with certain benefits, since divorce rate has been already fairly high, the country's birth rate then would decrease very very much since the females would have great burden for raising up kids if without any extra assistance! Hence negative population growth.
That could be ultimately a great damage to the country's core economy system, if not collapsed in 2 or 3 if not 4 or 5 generations!
Just 2 cents!
Q
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birth_rate
Current
The United States population growth is at an historical low level as the United States current birth rates are the lowest ever recorded.[28] The low birth rates in the contemporary United States can possibly be ascribed to the recession, which led women to postpone having children and fewer immigrants coming to the US. The current US birth rates are not high enough to maintain the size of the U.S. population, according to The Economist.[29][30]
UQ
Our education and prison system was not designed to accomodate children of single mothers.
busing started for me when I was in 6 or 7th grade.
I played basketball in the morning before school with the kids who were holding me up for my bus pass (at least once at knife point) when I went to the bathroom. It happened 3 times in 7th grade.
My mom said private schools. My dad said no, we will move to Connecticut.
I far preferred not being mugged to any of the other cultural benefits I may have received.
One reflection - I remember when I first got to my new junior high and I was walking around in the school yard and a few black kids there were trying to act tough. I was thinking to myself they had no idea what tough was. I went from going to school in a battle zone where you constantly had to be aware... to feeling like it was a walk in the park. It was so relaxing. I feel for the kids who actually want to learn something in our inner city schools. It must really suck.
I played basketball in the morning before school with the kids who were holding me up for my bus pass (at least once at knife point) when I went to the bathroom. It happened 3 times in 7th grade.
My mom said private schools. My dad said no, we will move to Connecticut.
I far preferred not being mugged to any of the other cultural benefits I may have received.
One reflection - I remember when I first got to my new junior high and I was walking around in the school yard and a few black kids there were trying to act tough. I was thinking to myself they had no idea what tough was. I went from going to school in a battle zone where you constantly had to be aware... to feeling like it was a walk in the park. It was so relaxing. I feel for the kids who actually want to learn something in our inner city schools. It must really suck.
I hear ya, The all white suburban public school before the Department of Education gave me an excellent education in reading, writing and arithmetic. And that's all I think public schools should teach. But in real life, I could have benefited much more if my school was more diversified. In the last years we had bussing. It was quite comical. First time we ever had violence (and eventually cops) in our schools. But I probably got more education from bussing in my senior year in high school than I would have got from one more year of White Suburban teaching.
This is nonsense. As proof I need only quote this question of yours, "How come I never hear, 'America is the only industrialized nation whose citizens don't need the government to provide them with basic needs, like healthcare?' "When you start ranking a countries capitalism based on how many government benefits they deny
Or a countries socialism based on how many government benefits they provide
You are already so brainwashed that you only understand benefits if they are provided by the government.
How come I never hear, "America is the only industrialized nation whose citizens don't need the government to provide them with basic needs, like healthcare."?
No one can know whether government is needed to provide its citizens with basic healthcare. All countries on Earth that do provide basic healthcare to all their citizens, regardless of their ability to pay, make use of government to do it. The U.S. is the lone country left of Earth, among developed nations, that does NOT provide its citizens with ready access to routine healthcare, regardless of their ability to pay. Consequently, the jury is still out on the question of whether, America is the only industrialized nation whose citizens "...don't need the government to provide them with basic needs, like healthcare." We don't yet know whether the government is needed or not. All we can say for certain is we haven't yet been able to provide , even with some government involvement, access to routine healthcare for everyone. It is likely, therefore, that this statement , "America is the only industrialized nation whose citizens don't need the government to provide them with basic needs, like healthcare" , is WRONG! It is definitely wrong up to this point. That is why you never hear such a statement!
May I respectfully suggest you smoke dope less and think more. If you did, I am confident you could answer many of your own questions.
Last edited:
piezoe, have you ever heard of Medicaid and medicare? And programs provided at the state level? And laws mandating treatment of sick people by hospitals, regardless of ability to pay?