Quote from denner:
There is one common theme amongst all of the opinions. Namely, the fact that the repeal of Glass Steagall was a bad idea. We can all agree on that.
It's also well known that at approximately the same time (perhaps 2 years after the 1999 repeal of Glass Steagall), Rubin, Summers and Greenspan all fought against the CFTC regulation of derivatives.
Now, put 2+2 together. Glass Steagall was repealed and within no time banks were leveraging up via derivatives, creating the immense shadow banking system which collapsed and precipitated all of the b.s. that we've had to endure the past few years.
I go back to the analogy about the firefighter and the arsonist. The same institution which set the fire has been heralded for its "valiant efforts" in fighting this fire. It seems that Greenspan has been scapegoated and now Bernanke is given a free pass. I'm certain the entire episode was designed to place blame upon one party so as to give leeway for the successor to "do what's necessary".
Many people have fallen for this trick, that much I'm sure of after reading thread after thread arguing in favor of Bernanke's actions.