Another key point here is that just because fiat currencies are relative, this does not mean that hard assets cannot experience hyperinflation with regards to all the fiats....in their representative countries...
Also, the idea of any asset considered to be a currency bouyancy vehicle, will be subject to its own supply demand issues....
Let's say I print a piece of paper....
My military and reputation says it is worth $100....
Then I print 1000 times more of the same paper, and I still want to insist that it is worth a $100....
Well, who is to say that the paper is not worth $100 ?
Those that have a demand for it....or do not any longer have a demand for it....
Ok, so in reality if I print the picture of a flower on one currency, and I paint a picture of a gun on another currency, are they not the same ?
So what makes them different ?
What makes them different is how they handle their financial affairs....whether as a people or as a country they save money and do not incur too much debt....
So what is it about
Indonesia
Argentina
Dominican Republic
Iceland
Turkey
Iraq
Brazil
Russia
US
Euro
Swiss Franc
Zimbabwe
etc...
that would make one piece of paper worth more than another...?
It is simply how the governments run their financial affairs.....
What if all countries behaved the exact same, spent the same amount of money, saved the same amount of money, etc...?
Then how would the currency valuations differ?