Benghazi

I happen to think that these Congressional hearings -- whose purpose is to attack Hillary rather than get to the bottom of what happened at Benghazi and enact changes to improve things -- are a complete waste of time.

Very little of the Benghazi narrative will "stick" to Hillary, and the hearings are just giving her a platform to appear "presidential" with pre-prepared commentary.

The reality is that the email server issue is more likely to stick to Hillary -- expect she has already designated that one woman aide to be the fall person if the issue blows up.
 
Yeah republicans shootin themselves in the dick again,(what else is new) they are just looking like the loons in the democratic party who tried to call cheney and bush war criminals.

gwb-trading said:
I happen to think that these Congressional hearings -- whose purpose is to attack Hillary rather than get to the bottom of what happened at Benghazi and enact changes to improve things -- are a complete waste of time.

Very little of the Benghazi narrative will "stick" to Hillary, and the hearings are just giving here a platform to appear "presidential" with pre-prepared commentary.

The reality is that the email server issue is more likely to stick to Hillary -- expect she has already designated that one woman aide to be the fall person if the issue blows up.
More...
 
12109160_1209976689028976_3773414155168420602_n.jpg


Expect that to show up on FOXNews.
 
What exactly are we supposed to be learning?

Terrorists attacked the embassy.
The administration lied about it and claimed it was because of a video.
Hillary was MIA.

This has all been known for the last two years. Whats new? If nothing, why waste the time?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top