Ben Carson Leads GOP Poll

US Presidential campaign 2016: Donald Trump says he is 'seriously thinking' about White House run


The number of potential Republican candidates for the White House continues to grow and grow with billionaire Donald Trump being the latest to say he may throw his hat into the ring.

Mr Trump, 68, who said he may make a run for the presidency only to decide against it both in 2008 and 2012, said over the weekend he was “seriously thinking” about a campaign. He claimed he was the only person who could run the country.

“I’m the one person who can make this country great again, that’s all I know,” he told reporters after a speech on Saturday in Iowa, whose primary caucuses kick off the formal presidential election next January. “Nobody else can.”

Mr Trump was speaking at a the Iowa Freedom Summit, a gathering organised by Iowa Congressman Steve King and which drew a number of potential 2016 candidates to Des Moines.
Among those who did not attend were presumed front-runners Mitt Romney and Jeb Bush. As it was, Mr Trump claimed neither man could win in 2016.

“It can’t be Mitt, because Mitt ran and failed. Mitt had his chance. He should have won and he choked. You don’t want to give a choker a second chance,” he said, according to CNN. “You can't have Bush. The last thing we need is another Bush.”

A number of commentators have said Mr Trump receives more media coverage than his seriousness as a potential candidate deserves. A number have suggested Mr Trump is interested primarily in self publicity. He spent a lot time in previous campaigns trying to prove that President Barack Obama was not born in the US.

And yet the star of his own reality television show, claimed he could address many of the country’s most pressing problems.

“If I run for president, and if I win, I would totally succeed in creating jobs, defeating ISIS, and stopping the Islamic terrorists, reducing the budget deficit, securing our southern border, stopping nuclear weapons in Iran and elsewhere,” he said.

Among the potential contenders who attended the event were former Texas Governor Rick Perry, former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee, Texas Senator Ted Cruz and former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum.

Reuters said that perhaps the warmest reception was given to Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker, who survived a recall attempt over his conservative policies in 2012 and won re-election in November. The news agency said he received a standing ovation when he made clear he is seriously considering a White House run in 2016.

He was withering in his criticism of Mr Obama for not attending a march of world leaders in Paris two weeks ago to show solidarity for the French after attacks there. “We need leaders who will stand with our allies against radical Islamic terrorists,” he said.

Mr Trump’s comments came after another conservative favourite, Sarah Palin, suggested she may also be open to running for the presidency.

The former governor of Alaska, and running mate of John McCain in an unsuccessful 2008 presidential campaign, said: “When you have a servant’s heart, when you know that there is opportunity to do all you can to put yourself forward in the name of offering service, anybody would be interested.”
 
Well stated. The problem is: Both sides think the other is extreme and certainly each have different definitions of the center. Is there a true center? If so, what is it, and how do we know the answer is itself not biased?

Theoretically there is a "true center" but practically there is a continuum from far right to far left, and there is no reason why all laws must be plotted on the same spot in that continuum. A more important consideration is getting things done. Republicans, for example, made it clear six years ago that they would do all they could to defeat whatever initiatives Democrats came up with and make Obama a one-term president. This is not responsible governing.
 
Theoretically there is a "true center" but practically there is a continuum from far right to far left, and there is no reason why all laws must be plotted on the same spot in that continuum. A more important consideration is getting things done. Republicans, for example, made it clear six years ago that they would do all they could to defeat whatever initiatives Democrats came up with and make Obama a one-term president. This is not responsible governing.

"If congress won't act, I will". That sounds a little like "My way or the highway". That throws mud in the face of a 3 branch system. I would not consider that responsible governing either.
 
"If congress won't act, I will". That sounds a little like "My way or the highway". That throws mud in the face of a 3 branch system. I would not consider that responsible governing either.
This might be true if the "if Congress won't act" condition was absent.
 
This might be true if the "if Congress won't act" condition was absent.
Apparently Obama didn't get the memo...after the actions of the left wing super majority ended. Or maybe they just weren't acting the way he wanted them to.

Actually, there is no maybe to it.
 
Apparently Obama didn't get the memo...after the actions of the left wing super majority ended. Or maybe they just weren't acting the way he wanted them to.

Actually, there is no maybe to it.

Actually they weren't acting at all.

Are we now diverting into the usual anti-Obama stream?
 
Oh. I read Ricter incorrectly then.
You've got it all incorrect. The super majority is long gone. Obama has been facing the "party of no" for years now (a fact the right celebrates when it considers its successes v. Obama), and Obama is facing an even bigger party of no now. There is work to do, problems to be addressed. If Congress won't act, which is precisely what Obama said, then he will. In other words, get your ass in gear or pack your personal belongings and vacate the building.
 
If Congress won't act, which is precisely what Obama said, then he will. In other words, get your ass in gear or pack your personal belongings and vacate the building.

That's called tyranny in some circles. Or as I said...my way or the highway. Obama should be as willing to work with the right as he wishes they would be with him. He is not, and you deceive yourself if you think otherwise. How many veto's were promised during state of the union? He is only interested in working together when he gets his way. That's not the way the system was meant to be.
 
Back
Top