Quote from jem:
They simply can not prove there is no creator.
My argument does not require anyone to prove a negative...
Sw and Stu you state there is no God. How do you know? how can you prove it.
You must be kidding right? Your argument "does not require anyone to prove a negative".!??
No way .Your rationality can't be that far gone, surely!? sheesh.
Just in case , see if this might help ...
"They simply can not prove there is no creator.? "
Yes I can jem. I can prove to you there is no creator.
I can
prove categorically,
without doubt,
without question, there is no creator.
Now, ... you prove I cannot.
Fair enough. It's what you are doing. Asking others to prove a negative.
So go on. I have proof there is no Creator. Prove I don't. Prove the negative.
...or is it that the onus, the burden of proof, is on me ? I make the assertion therefore I provide the proof. I do not require others to prove the opposite of my assertion or in other words, prove the negative.
So when you say "They simply cannot prove there is no creator ", you are asking for the contrary of your argument (that there is a creator) to be proved. That is asking to prove the negative.
I must say in regard to the topic of this thread, it is hard to see how Market Perspective can be in any way improved by a belief in God mentality. Especially one which denies what it is actually doing and at the same time contradicts straightforward understanding in a way that does not allow a sensible and reasonable approach to reasoning. I mention no names.
jem!!