Quote from kidPWRtrader:
Thanks, I'm by no means an expert. I do know what a trend looks like and how to follow it, though. I'm surprised at how difficult this is for some people.
Unlike you, I dont even attempt to fade support... if I don't think it will hold, I will just leave it alone (I dont have the skill to fade consistently).
I do think that moving average crossovers can be played profitably but it involves a lot of sitting on your hands when market conditions arn't right. I think MA crossovers even work better long term, although I don't trade them as I prefer price for entries and MAs to just define the trend and give me a basis of r/w.
Also want to add to your point on indicators. A year ago I also relied on indicators because I somehow thought they would make my trading better. Well, of course I used default settings without regard to what the indicators really told other than textbook answers (which are usually wrong). I have dropped all indicators since then (minus the moving averages).
At one point I had moving averages, MACD, Stochs, and OBV on one chart and I would draw 1259812598 trend lines and make my bets accordingly only to find my bottomline didn't care for indicators that wern't properly suited to my definition of trend (in my time period)
I hope I haven't come across as a self-proclaimed "expert", as that was not my intention. I am in no way an expert on the markets, not even close.
As for moving averages, take a 3 minute ES chart and plot a 10 EMA and a 30 EMA. Ignore the MA's and draw your trend lines as you normally would. Mark where the MA's cross and where the trend lines are broken by price. Notice anything?
Now, plot higher highs, higher lows, lower highs, and lower lows. After a succession of higher highs or vice versa, note when you first get a change of trend, i.e., a HH, HL, HH, HL, LH, HL or equivalent. Notice the LH is the first indication of a change of trend, but then is followed by another HL. This is usually the first sign of entering chop, but the MA's will still cross leading you into a bad trade.
Price is the only thing that I have found that will consistently define trend, chop, and the range as it is happening. I get very few false signals using this method.
As soon as I see consolidation begin, I stand aside until the next swing either confirms it or not, and then trade the range rather than trend if it proves to be true. Once the range is broken, I then resume trading the trend, whichever direction that may be. It doesn't matter what the setting of the MA's are or the type, you simply cannot do that with MA's.
That said, you can take a 21 Hull MA on a 8 minute chart, and it will give fairly accurate entries, but if you wait for the Hull to change direction for the exit, you will get beat up. Using the tick for exits works well. If your charting allows, paint the rising HMA green or blue and a falling HMA red for quick visual of the turns.
Another easy method is to use a 9 and an 18 SMA. When they cross, enter at the first pull back to the 18 with a tight stop just below the tail of the pullback. Low risk trade, but again, it won't identify chop until you've been stopped out a few times. Another
variation of that setup is to use a 10 SMA with a 30WMA.
Once you see what price is doing in relation to the MA's, you can remove the MA's and trade without them. Just watch the swings and draw your lines. In time, you won't eve need to draw the lines to see the action. It's amazingly simple, but damn hard to master. Your brain is always wanting to screw with you!
Understand what the MA's are telling you, and you will learn to see the same thing in price alone with a higher degree of accuracy.
st