Beau Bergdahl- A different view

Nice theories about how Berghahl is the true victim here
I haven't been able to read that into anything I've written. Sorry. But nevertheless it is point perhaps not totally devoid of merit, so congratulations for coming up with it on your own. A better point however is that had the Judge not taken into account the transgressions of the Military's Commander and Chief, then Bergdahl would have got what he seems to have deserved, judging from the outside, but the military justice system would have been made a co-victim along side those injured looking for Bergdahl. The Judge found a way to avoid this.
 
Last edited:
I haven't been able to read that into anything I've written. Sorry. But nevertheless it is point perhaps not totally devoid of merit, so congratulations for coming up with it on your own. A better point however is that had the Judge not taken into account the transgressions of the Military's Commander and Chief, then Bergdahl would have got what he seems to have deserved, judging from the outside, but the military justice system would have been made a co-victim along side those injured looking for Bergdahl. The Judge found a way to avoid this.



When Bergdahl came home the military was already aware that his behavior before the enemy was possibly criminal or at a minimum would be subject to further investigation.

However, during that same period Obama and his underlings collectively promoted a narrative that said that he had "served with honor and disctinction." Need I remind you that Obama was also Commander in Chief at that time. DO YOU, BY CHANCE, THINK THAT THAT TOO POSSIBLY INFLUENCED POTENTIAL JURORS AND THE PUBLIC THAT HE WAS NOT GUILTY OF DESERTION AND MISBEHAVIOR BEFORE THE ENEMY. HOW IS THAT ANY FRIGGING DIFFERENT THAN TRUMP GIVING HIS OPINION THAT HE WAS GUILTY??????? Did that bother you too?

Didn't think so.

 
yeah... eastern block and the soviet union did so well with leftist ideas. Cuba Venezuela... the list goes on.

piezoe... you have become a slateist buffoon.




That's only because truth and facts have a lefty leaning bias, what am I to do? I can't change that.
 
When Bergdahl came home the military was already aware that his behavior before the enemy was possibly criminal or at a minimum would be subject to further investigation.

However, during that same period Obama and his underlings collectively promoted a narrative that said that he had "served with honor and disctinction." Need I remind you that Obama was also Commander in Chief at that time. DO YOU, BY CHANCE, THINK THAT THAT TOO POSSIBLY INFLUENCED POTENTIAL JURORS AND THE PUBLIC THAT HE WAS NOT GUILTY OF DESERTION AND MISBEHAVIOR BEFORE THE ENEMY. HOW IS THAT ANY FRIGGING DIFFERENT THAN TRUMP GIVING HIS OPINION THAT HE WAS GUILTY??????? Did that bother you too?

Didn't think so.

Reports of Bergdahl's performance would have originated in in the army near the command level, Not with Obama's level, whose administration would simply depend on the information passed to them. I would be a good idea to shift your brain out of neutral and into gear.
 
Reports of Bergdahl's performance would have originated in in the army near the command level, Not with Obama's level, whose administration would simply depend on the information passed to them. I would be a good idea to shift your brain out of neutral and into gear.


Really. Well sounds like there needs to be a process to look at all these things before you even make a prisoner swap. What was the level that Obama depended upon when he decided to violate the law by excluding congress?

One could fairly easily make a case that it was in fact Obama who created an excessive atmosphere of vitriol around Bergdahl in advance of his trial/investigation by unlawfully executing a prison swap of Taliban leaders. Put your brain in gear and give that some thought.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/09/politics/taliban-5-bowe-bergdahl-congress-report/index.html
 
One could fairly easily make a case that it was in fact Obama who created an excessive atmosphere of vitriol around Bergdahl in advance of his trial/investigation by unlawfully executing a prison swap of Taliban leaders.
Not only could "one" do that, it has been done. So ultimately "one" has to use "one's" judgement, and therein lies the rub.

________________
`To die, to sleep; To sleep, perchance to dream. Aye there's the rub; For in that sleep of death what dreams may come...' --Shakespeare's "Hamlet"
(Mr. Hamlet, ;), is trying to assess whether or not it is a kool idea to 'shuffle off this mortal coil', i.e., commit suicide.)
 
Last edited:
Not only could "one" do that, it has been done. So ultimately "one" has to use "one's" judgement, and therein lies the rub.

And you used your judgement to immediately see Trumps transgressions but needed to have cue cards held up to see Obama's. Therein lies the rub indeed.
Break out of the lefty trance state and you will see such things without the cue cards.
 
And you used your judgement to immediately see Trumps transgressions but needed to have cue cards held up to see Obama's. Therein lies the rub indeed.
Break out of the lefty trance state and you will see such things without the cue cards.
As it turns out I am cursed with seeing them both with acuity. And what I see is a 'huge' difference, 'bigly', 'believe me!'. In fact, 'it's the greatest difference in the history of the Country,' 'everyone says so', 'believe me!', 'Get'em Outahere!'
 
Last edited:
Back
Top