So nice of you to pop in and comment.![]()
Been away, trying to trade, rather than yammer on about some math dude's theory on the nature of the universe through maths and how it predicts bears and bulls, and waves within waves within waves within waves within waves.
Which by the way, seems a bit cheap, when how a series of waves does not work, it is conveniently pieced down into sub-waves, and then another subset of waves within those subwaves, to eventually derive the desired result.
Wave 1,2,3,4,5. But wait! After that is an A,B,C wave! But wait, there's more!
In wave 1, you can have a wave (a) (b) (c) before you reach wave 2, because wave 2 did not beeline to complete wave 1.
On Wave 3, the confirmation wave of wave 1, we can have a few subsets because there are shadows of the pullback wave 2 (A), which ultimately led (obviously, in hindsight) to it's completion and thus beginning of wave 3. In Wave 3 however, we will never know when we have started wave 4 because this is the BIG wave!
On the way to starting wave 4 we will have Wave 3 A (a)a, a new wave 1 within wave 3 a but above wave (a)a but not after (a)b, but wait a minute...Wave 3 A(a)a B(ab)2 was not hit. So this MUST be the start of wave 4.
I think it was this guy who came up with the whole wave theory thing.